Saturday, April 7, 2012

Terence Mckenna - To wrap it all up...

Terence Mckenna - To wrap it all up... - thelakeysisters

The end of the late Terence Mckenna's classic "Eros and the Eschaton" lecture.

The Top Short-Term Threat to Humanity: The Fuel Pools of Fukushima

The Top Short-Term Threat to Humanity: The Fuel Pools of Fukushima - Washington Blog

We noted days after the Japanese earthquake that the biggest threat was from the spent fuel rods in the fuel pool at Fukushima unit number 4, and not from the reactors themselves. See this and this.

We noted in February:
Scientists say that there is a 70% chance of a magnitude 7.0 earthquake hitting Fukushima this year, and a 98% chance within the next 3 years.

Given that nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen says that an earthquake of 7.0 or larger could cause the entire fuel pool structure collapse, it is urgent that everything humanly possible is done to stabilize the structure housing the fuel pools at reactor number 4.

Tepco is doing some construction at the building … it is a race against time under very difficult circumstances, and hopefully Tepco will win.

As AP points out:
The structural integrity of the damaged Unit 4 reactor building has long been a major concern among experts because a collapse of its spent fuel cooling pool could cause a disaster worse than the three reactor meltdowns.
***

Gundersen (who used to build spent fuel pools) explains that there is no protection surrounding the radioactive fuel in the pools. He warns that – if the fuel pools at reactor 4 collapse due to an earthquake – people should get out of Japan, and residents of the West Coast of America and Canada should shut all of their windows and stay inside for a while.
The fuel pool number 4 is apparently not in great shape, and there have already been countless earthquakes near the Fukushima region since the 9.0 earthquake last March.
Germany’s ZDF tv quotes nuclear engineer Yukitero Naka as saying:
If another earthquake occurs then the building [number 4] could collapse and another chain reaction could very likely occur.
(Unit 4 contains plutonium as well as other radioactive wastes.)

Mainchi reported on Monday:
The storage pool in the No. 4 reactor building has a total of 1,535 fuel rods, or 460 tons of nuclear fuel, in it. The 7-story building itself has suffered great damage, with the storage pool barely intact on the building’s third and fourth floors. The roof has been blown away. If the storage pool breaks and runs dry, the nuclear fuel inside will overheat and explode, causing a massive amount of radioactive substances to spread over a wide area. Both the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and French nuclear energy company Areva have warned about this risk.

A report released in February by the Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident stated that the storage pool of the plant’s No. 4 reactor has clearly been shown to be “the weakest link” in the parallel, chain-reaction crises of the nuclear disaster. The worse-case scenario drawn up by the government includes not only the collapse of the No. 4 reactor pool, but the disintegration of spent fuel rods from all the plant’s other reactors. If this were to happen, residents in the Tokyo metropolitan area would be forced to evacuate.

Former Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Sumio Mabuchi, who was appointed to the post of then Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s advisor on the nuclear disaster immediately after its outbreak, proposed the injection of concrete from below the No. 4 reactor to the bottom of the storage pool, Chernobyl-style.

***

“Because sea water was being pumped into the reactor, the soundness of the structure (concrete corrosion and deterioration) was questionable. There also were doubts about the calculations made on earthquake resistance as well,” said one government source familiar with what took place at the time. “[F]uel rod removal will take three years. Will the structure remain standing for that long?
Asahi noted last month that - if Unit 4 pool gets a crack from an earthquake and leaks, it would be the end for Tokyo.

Kevin Kamps said last month:
Unit 4 storage pool… The entire building is listing including the pool. What they have is steel jacks underneath the pool to try to keep the floor from falling out or the pool from flipping over.

If that cooling water supply is lost, it will be just a few hours at most before that waste is on fire. 135 tons outside of any radioactive containment. They would be direct releases into the environment. 100% of cesium-137 could be released to the environment.



Former U.N. adviser Akio Matsumura – whose praises have been sung by Mikhail Gorbachev, U.S. Ambassadors Stephen Bosworth and Glenn Olds, and former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State and Goldman Sachs co-chair John C. Whitehead – notes:
The unit suffered enormous damage during the tsunami—a hydrogen explosion blew the roof off, leaving the highly radioactive fuel pool exposed to the open air. If another high level earthquake hits the area, the building will certainly collapse. Japanese and American meteorologists have predicted that such a strong earthquake is indeed likely to hit this year.

The meltdown and unprecedented release of radiation that would ensue is the worst case scenario that then-Prime Minister Kan and other former officials have discussed in the past months. He warned during his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos that such an accident would force the evacuation of the 35 million people in Tokyo, close half of Japan and compromise the nation’s sovereignty. Such a humanitarian and environmental catastrophe is unimaginable. Hiroshi Tasaka, a nuclear engineer and special adviser to Prime Minister Kan immediately following the crisis, said the crisis “just opened Pandora’s Box.”

The current Japanese government has not yet mentioned the looming disaster, ostensibly to not incite panic in the public. Nevertheless, action must be taken quickly. This website over the last year has published a running commentary from scientists explaining why Reactor 4 must be stabilized immediately, who might be able to accomplish such a task, and why the situation has largely gone unnoticed. We believe an independent, international team of structural engineers and other advisers must be assembled and deployed immediately. Mounting public pressure would force the Japanese government to take action. We hope these resources are helpful in educating the public about the crisis that we face.

As the eminent German physicist Dr. Hans-Peter Durr said ten months ago, if the spent fuel pool spills, we will be in a situation where science never imagined we could be.
Matsumura was told that if the fuel pool at unit 4 collapses or the water spills out, so much radiation will spew out for 50 years that no one will be able to approach Fukushima:



Even more dramatically, Matsumura writes:
Japan’s former Ambassador to Switzerland, Mr. Mitsuhei Murata, was invited to speak at the Public Hearing of the Budgetary Committee of the House of Councilors on March 22, 2012, on the Fukushima nuclear power plants accident. Before the Committee, Ambassador Murata strongly stated that if the crippled building of reactor unit 4—with 1,535 fuel rods in the spent fuel pool 100 feet (30 meters) above the ground—collapses, not only will it cause a shutdown of all six reactors but will also affect the common spent fuel pool containing 6,375 fuel rods, located some 50 meters from reactor 4. In both cases the radioactive rods are not protected by a containment vessel; dangerously, they are open to the air. This would certainly cause a global catastrophe like we have never before experienced. He stressed that the responsibility of Japan to the rest of the world is immeasurable. Such a catastrophe would affect us all for centuries. Ambassador Murata informed us that the total numbers of the spent fuel rods at the Fukushima Daiichi site excluding the rods in the pressure vessel is 11,421 (396+615+566+1,535+994+940+6375).

I asked top spent-fuel pools expert Mr. Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment at the U.S. Department of Energy, for an explanation of the potential impact of the 11,421 rods.
I received an astounding response from Mr. Alvarez [updated 4/5/12]:
In recent times, more information about the spent fuel situation at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site has become known. It is my understanding that of the 1,532 spent fuel assemblies in reactor No. 304 assemblies are fresh and unirradiated. This then leaves 1,231 irradiated spent fuel rods in pool No. 4, which contain roughly 37 million curies (~1.4E+18 Becquerel) of long-lived radioactivity. The No. 4 pool is about 100 feet above ground, is structurally damaged and is exposed to the open elements. If an earthquake or other event were to cause this pool to drain this could result in a catastrophic radiological fire involving nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 released by the Chernobyl accident.

The infrastructure to safely remove this material was destroyed as it was at the other three reactors. Spent reactor fuel cannot be simply lifted into the air by a crane as if it were routine cargo. In order to prevent severe radiation exposures, fires and possible explosions, it must be transferred at all times in water and heavily shielded structures into dry casks.. As this has never been done before, the removal of the spent fuel from the pools at the damaged Fukushima-Dai-Ichi reactors will require a major and time-consuming re-construction effort and will be charting in unknown waters. Despite the enormous destruction cased at the Da–Ichi site, dry casks holding a smaller amount of spent fuel appear to be unscathed.

Based on U.S. Energy Department data, assuming a total of 11,138 spent fuel assemblies are being stored at the Dai-Ichi site, nearly all, which is in pools. They contain roughly 336 million curies (~1.2 E+19 Bq) of long-lived radioactivity. About 134 million curies is Cesium-137 — roughly 85 times the amount of Cs-137 released at the Chernobyl accident as estimated by the U.S. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP). The total spent reactor fuel inventory at the Fukushima-Daichi site contains nearly half of the total amount of Cs-137 estimated by the NCRP to have been released by all atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, Chernobyl, and world-wide reprocessing plants (~270 million curies or ~9.9 E+18 Becquerel).

It is important for the public to understand that reactors that have been operating for decades, such as those at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site have generated some of the largest concentrations of radioactivity on the planet.
Many of our readers might find it difficult to appreciate the actual meaning of the figure, yet we can grasp what 85 times more Cesium-137 than the Chernobyl would mean. It would destroy the world environment and our civilization. This is not rocket science, nor does it connect to the pugilistic debate over nuclear power plants. This is an issue of human survival.

There was a Nuclear Security Summit Conference in Seoul on March 26 and 27, and Ambassador Murata and I made a concerted effort to find someone to inform the participants from 54 nations of the potential global catastrophe of reactor unit 4. We asked several participants to share the idea of an Independent Assessment team comprised of a broad group of international experts to deal with this urgent issue.

I would like to introduce Ambassador Murata’s letter to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to convey this urgent message and also his letter to Japan’s Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda for Japanese readers. He emphasized in the statement that we should bring human wisdom to tackle this unprecedented challenge.
Ambassador Murata’s letter says:
It is no exaggeration to say that the fate of Japan and the whole world depends on NO.4 reactor. This is confirmed by most reliable experts like Dr. Arnie Gundersen or Dr. Fumiaki Koide.
Anti-nuclear physician Dr. Helen Caldicott says that if fuel pool 4 collapses, she will evacuate her family from Boston and move them to the Southern Hemisphere. This is an especially dramatic statement given that the West Coast is much more directly in the path of Fukushima radiation than the East Coast.

Will humanity rise to the occasion, and figure out how to stabilize fuel pool number 4 before catastrophe strikes?

Or will modern civilization win a Darwin award for failing to pay attention to the real threats?

"Don't Eat The Food" - a message for Japan

"Don't Eat The Food" - a message for Japan - ah, mephistophelis

Editor's note: I found this wonderful video by way of Mike Rivero who offers up an amazing secret news service for people who think and wanted to thank him and reveal this astonishing video.

Friday, April 6, 2012

The Amazing Healing Properties of Fermented Foods

© Greenmedinfo.com
The Amazing Healing Properties of Fermented Foods by Sayer Ji

Between the hard and fast dichotomies of cooked and raw, dead and alive, is this beautiful thing called fermented.  A place where many of the digestive challenges associated with raw foods (e.g. enzyme inhibitors, antinutrients, lectins) are overcome in favor of not just preserving their benefits (e.g. enzyme activity, vitamin content, life energy), but amplifying them. Also overcome are the adverse consequences of cooking, e.g. enzyme destruction, vitamin activity degradation, oxidized fats, denatured proteins, etc., while still benefiting from the enhanced digestibility and assimilation that certain cooking applications offer.  Fermented food is in many ways the complementary union of cooked and raw, as well as their transcendence – an image, not unlike the Tai Chi, comes to mind.

In fact, fermentation has almost heretical power in the realm of both medicine and nutrition, being quite capable of literally "raising the dead," as well, revitalizing and infusing with living and breathing energy a food ingredient that has been cooked into oblivion, or, a human whose body has been poisoned close to the point of death with antibiotics, or similarly biocidal drugs or chemicals.

There is no lack of scientific confirmation for the indisputable value of fermented food for the promotion of health & wellbeing. In fact, one could consider fermented foods like kimchi, natto, apple cider vinegar, and even – in moderation – wine, coffee, chocolate and beer, ‘medical foods’ of sorts.  At GreenMedInfo we have been indexing these functional applications in disease prevention and treatment straight from the research housed on National Library of Medicine, and have found over 140+ diseases that may be prevented or ameliorated by their use.

There are a broad range of fermented foods we could look at to illustrate their power to heal. After all, every single culture on the planet used (not a semantic coincidence:) culturing to sustain themselves.  But for this short article we will focus on Asian traditional preparations, since there is already such a huge body of clinical research demonstrating their amazing health effects:
  • Kimchi – a probiotic strain isolated from the fermented cabbage preparation kimchi known as Lactobacillus brevis is capable of degrading organophosphorus pesticides.   
  • Kimchi – a probiotic strain known as Bacillus pumilus found within this fermented food is capable of degrading bisphenol A, a powerful endocrine disruptive chemical.
  • Miso – a fermented soy food has been shown, when consumed regularly, to reduce the risk of breast cancer in women by up to 54%.
  • Miso – capable of regressing colon cancer growth in the animal model.
  • Natto – A fermented soybean extract that has been shown to suppress plaque buildup (as measured by the intima media thickness) in the arteries in an animal model.
  • Natto – capable of contributing to nerve regeneration following sciatic nerve crush injury.
This is, of course, only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to illustrating the remarkable properties of fermented food. We encourage our readers to take a look at our extensive database on the subject of the health benefits of fermented food.

Another important point to make about fermented food is that it generates an entirely novel set of nutrients and medically important phytocompounds, in addition to what is found in the starter culture ingredients themselves.  This is not unlike what happens when we consume a raw or cooked food, and the beneficial bacteria within our gut go to work to break down antinutrients, or secrete enzymes we ourselves are not capable of producing, or at least not in adequate quantities.  There is something known as the food metabolome. It is that set of small-molecule metabolites of foods – numbering over 3,500 – that are byproducts of our organism interacting with food to produce novel new byproducts.  For example, flaxseed contains high levels of lignans, which once thrown into the fermentive crucible of our digestive process, are broken down into at least two important metabolic byproducts: enterlactone and enterodial – both which are phytoestrogens, and are largely responsible for flaxseed’s tumor regressive actions in estrogen sensitive cancers such as breast and prostate cancer.  These two compounds only exist in between the human organism and the flaxseed organism, and would not exist without the “third organism,” if you will, which is the vast populations of beneficial bacteria within our alimentary canal.  So important are these microflora to our existence, that some scholars have suggested we reclassify ourselves as a “meta-organism,” as we are a composite of a wide range of organisms – in fact, 10 times more numerous are these “other” organisms than our own cells. Indeed, as we discussed in a previous article, even our own mitochondria – the powerhouses of our cells – were once bacteria living outside of our bodies.

Ultimately, a return to fermented foods are a return to our own ground of being, and well-being. There are profound challenges that stand in our way, of course. The modern world nukes its food, yes, with literal nuclear waste.  We microwave, we cook, we fry, we dehydrate, we spray our food into certain death. And now new research shows that even the very food starter bacteria normally found within healthy soil are being decimated by Monsanto’s ROUNDUP herbicide glyphosate, which is destroying its microbial biodiversity and hence fertility. Certain regions of the world that have depended on these indispensable dairy-culturing organisms for countless generations now have none to be found.

So, we must hunker down. And work on cooperating locally to produce, and support the producers of, organically grown food.  Sharing raw cultures.  Becoming intimately involved with the quality of the food we consume. And remembering that fermented food is one of the key, if not indispensable ingredients in attaining and maintaining optimal health. And furthermore, that one cannot separate out personal or human health from planetary health; they are, and always have been indivisible.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Science Has Been Corrupted: Union of Concerned Scientists Claims in New Report

Painting by Gina Tyler on colored background
(text added). Gina's website is http://ginatyler.com.
(Clickable link below article)
Apr. 3, 2012: Science Has Been Corrupted: Union of Concerned Scientists Claims in New Report - Gaia Health

A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists says what Gaia Health has been saying: Science has been corrupted. All too often, its master is not the search for truth, but is the industries that use a wide range of subtle and not-so-subtle techniques to get the results they want. Science has become Pseudo Science.

Note: A video based on this article can be seen here.

The truth is damned if it runs counter to the industry of profits. The title of the Union of Concerned Scientists’ (UCS) report echoes the severity of the situation in its title, “Heads They Win, Tails We Lose”. The report describes the problem like this:
Unfortunately, censorship of scientists
and the manipulation, distortion, and suppression of
scientific information has threatened the federal scientific enterprise in recent years.
They don’t detail the incredible harm it’s doing to the people, the true victims of pseudo science.

Areas of Corruption


They describe several ways in which science has been abused:
  • Outright Corruption
  • Shaping Public Perception
  • Restricting Agency Effectiveness
  • Influencing Congress
  • Exploiting Judicial Pathways

Outright Corruption in the Research


We’ll focus on what they have to say about outright corruption.
Terminating and Suppressing Research
Corporations have controlled what research results are disseminated. In particular, they have withheld results that “would threaten their bottom line”.
Intimidating and Coercing Scientists
Scientists and the institutions that employ them are harassed. Scientists are threatened with lawsuits and losing their jobs. Their research is defunded. They aren’t promoted or don’t receive tenure, and they’re transferred out of research. Naturally, all of this results in self-censorship.
Study Design and Research Protocol Manipulated
Studies are designed and rules for running research projects are manipulated to assure results to the liking of the funding corporations. Even the questions that researchers ask in their studies are changed.
Ghostwriting
Scientific journals frequently utilize ghostwriters to publish articles that both spin study results and obscure the connection between studies and the corporations behind them.
Ignoring Negative Results
The science journals themselves are guilty of ignoring most negative results, though such information can be every bit as important as the results of studies that reach the conclusions expected.

Examples of Science Corruption


“Heads They Win, Tails We Lose” includes many examples from the world of medicine. Here are some:
GlaxoSmithKline: Paxil (antidepressant)
Between 1998 and 2002, GSK had five trials of Paxil done. Four of them were negative; that is, they were unable to show efficacy for the drug. Those four trials even documented the elevated suicide risk. One trial had mixed results. GSK only allowed that one to be published. The FDA could do nothing about it because the company had required the scientists to sign confidentiality agreements.
Boots: Synthroid (thyroid medication)
Boots hoped to demonstrate that its thyroid medication, Synthroid, was more effective than other such drugs and worth its excessive price. They commissioned Dr. Betty Dong, of the University of California – San Francisco, to test it. Her research didn’t go the way Boots wanted, so they ordered her not to publish the results. She refused and they threatened her with a lawsuit. That stayed her hand for several years. Of course, until she was able to publish, doctors prescribed and patients took the drug thinking they were getting something superior for the excessive price.

Agouron Pharmaceuticals: Remune (diabetes drug)

The clinical trial of the HIV drug, Remune, showed that it was not effective. The researcher published the study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The drug’s developer, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, retaliated by suing him.
GlaxoSmithKline: Avandia (heart drug)
In 2000, Dr. John Buse, University of North Carolina, published a study documenting that people who took Avandia had a high risk of heart disease. GSK contacted his boss, accused Buse of lying, and threatened to sue for the $4 billion drop in the company’s stock value. It wasn’t until 2010 that the an FDA advisory panel recommended recalling the drug, but the FDA merely put restrictions on its availability.
Merck: Vioxx (arthritis pain drug)
A marketing team in the Merck pharmaceutical corporation developed a strategy to exaggerate the effects of Vioxx for the purpose of increasing the changes for FDA approval. Part of that plan was to design a trial that compared Vioxx to naproxen, an over the counter drug. The result of that deeply flawed trial was to give the impression that naproxen decreases the risk of heart attack by 80%, in spite of the fact that existing trials had documented no heart benefit. By comparing Vioxx to naproxen, the false image was produced of a drug that doesn’t harm the heart.

Vioxx was finally pulled from the market in 2004 after tens of thousands of people had died, and many who took it are still suffering heart problems today.

Merck used ghostwriters extensively to push Vioxx in medical journals. Of 20 ghostwritten Vioxx articles, 16 listed a scientist as the author. Worse, these papers included analyses of the research and had been written before the scientists were involved.
Pfizer: Neurontin (epilepsy and nerve pain drug)
Pfizer manipulated the publication of 15 case studies, 6 case reports, and 9 letters to the editor for the use of Neurontin. As a result, use of it grew from 430,000 to 6 million patients per year. An investigation documented that negative results were not published, outcomes were reported selectively, and patients who were expected to do poorly on their drug were not included in the analyses. They also failed to report that Neurontin increases the risk of suicide.
Medical Journals: Risperdal (antipsychotic)
The impression that many studies had been done on Risperdal was accomplished by producing reports in six different publications under different author names for a single trial.
Monsanto: GMO Corn
Nature published an article by University of California – Berkeley graduate student David Quist showing that Monsanto’s genetically modified corn was contaminating native corn in Mexico. Nature received several letters to the editor and internet comments from people identifying themselves as Mary Murphy and Andura Smetacek. Because of the backlash, Nature produced an editorial saying that they should not have published the report.

It turned out that Mary Murphy and Andura Smetacek were actually from a public relations firm called The Bivings Group, which specialized in online publicity and worked for Monsanto. The names were fake.

“Heads They Win, Tails We Lose” cites example after example of how science is perverted. This article focuses primarily on Big Pharma, but the examples come from a wide arena, including tobacco, oil, coal, and endangered species. It is simply overwhelming how utterly corrupt modern science has become. When there’s money to be made, science is corrupted to produce results that increase the profits.

Solutions?


Unfortunately, for solutions, the report is focused on a government that it has acknowledged is complicit in the corruption. The deep financial ties of multinational corporations with every aspect of the US government are clearly demonstrated in the report. Regulating agencies are virtually owned by them. Corporate money determines what laws are passed and how they’re administered.

Therefore, none of their solutions stands a snowball’s chance of being implemented. The only solutions can come from us, the people. We need to make sure that fake science is not slavishly followed.

Whenever you see studies that purportedly prove a point, keep in mind that studies showing the opposite were likely suppressed, and that positive ones could easily be dishonest. When you see glowing reports of new drugs and treatments in the news, assume that they’re not legitimate. The odds are that they aren’t. When a scientist is famous and propounding on the benefits of something, ask whether he or she is profiting from it directly, or is otherwise funded by the company hoping to profit from it.

When our doctors prescribe treatments, don’t blindly accept their claims that they’re evidence-based. In reality, most of that so-called evidence is from corrupted science. Do your own research. Ask questions. Don’t just follow the crowd.

The primary tool being used is, in fact, not the corruption of science, but the marginalization of anyone who questions it. To refuse to accept the dictates of corrupted science marks a person as “someone different”, someone not to be trusted. That’s the risk you take by questioning.

But, if you hope to protect yourself against the harm done at the behest of the plutocrats, there’s little choice but to refuse to accept most of the tripe being passed off as science.

Hemp Fuel Revolution

Feb. 1, 2012: Hemp Fuel Revolution - yellowecotec



 Jack Herer (June 18, 1939 - April 15, 2010) - The Emperor of Hemp

"Make the most you can of the Indian Hemp seed and sow it everywhere." - George Washington

"The illegality of cannabis is outrageous, an impediment to full utilization of a drug which helps produce the serenity and insight, sensitivity and fellowship so desperately needed in this increasingly mad and dangerous world."
- Carl Sagan

Cannabis grows like a weed, repairs toxic soil, and grows better in hydroponics. This plant will save the world from the current path of self destruction. Oil was never intended to be drilled from the ground or deep water. Current petroleum, oils, plastics and most products are toxic to the environment and human health. Hemp products are biodegradable and healthy for the planet and all life. When food, fuels, plastics, fibre, medicine are grown locally energy consumption dramatically reduces.

We need repeal of an unconstitutional law that has filled our prisons with nonviolent cannabis users. The prohibition against marijuana was unconstitutional from its inception. Why is legalizing and limiting our ability to grow Hemp more popular than repealing the law to make it null and void so we are free to grow as many plants as we want?

There are not enough physical police, jail cells, or military to cleanse the planet of an abundant cannabis plant. If such an event were to occur, how could anyone destroy all of the cannabis plants while not killing wildlife, and nature?

Organic Food needs to be grown locally to reduce energy consumption. If the authorities won't take on this task, then it is up to "we the people." Even if you buy certified organic food in the supermarkets, at the checkout it goes through radiation which kills nutrients. Buy locally at farmers markets, and ask the source if the food is grown without poisonous pesticides (made from petroleum.) I created a video You are what You Eat if you are interested, you can find in my uploads.

This is a short video I created on hemp fuel. Some of the clips are from the documentary The Emperor of Hemp.

http://marijuanacannabis.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/how-to-make-cannabis-clones/
http://mylesohowe.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/hemp-fuel-revolution/


Comment: We could have had a peaceful world but those who have long known this chose otherwise. They chose a world based on disease, greed, and ignorance as their anthem and this is what they think of human life. There are many who would disagree.

Got a PUStache? The truth about PUS in pasteurized milk

Got a PUStache? The truth about PUS in pasteurized milk - TheHealthRanger



Got a PUStache? The latest "Food Investigations" video from Mike Adams, executive director of the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center. (www.ConsumerWellness.org) See more videos at www.FoodInvestigations.com

9/11 In Under Five Minutes

9/11 In Under Five Minutes - Corbett Report

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

The Living Seed Company – Seeds of Freedom

The Living Seed Company – Seeds of Freedom - Barbara H. Peterson

During my seed company investigation, I ran across the Living Seed Company. What a wonderful message! This company will definitely be included in the Farm Wars Safe Seed Company list.

Who they are:
In the spirit of planting seeds of peace, joy, beauty and food for this world, he and his fiancé Astrid decided to create the Living Seed Company. They believe the power of people growing food together and saving their own seeds is one of the best ways to achieve both inner harmony and global prosperity. Living Seed Company



Editors Note:
Farms Wars has also put together a great safe seed company list here.

78 percent increase in childhood autism rates over past decade coincides with sharp uptick in vaccination schedules

© unknown
78 percent increase in childhood autism rates over past decade coincides with sharp uptick in vaccination schedules by Jonathan Benson

(NaturalNews) The rate of autism among American children has nearly doubled over the past decade, according to a new report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), jumping from about one in 150 children back in 2000 to about one in 88 children in 2008, which is the last time official estimates were calculated. And interestingly, this steady rise in autism rates coincides directly with CDC-endorsed vaccination schedules that have also risen sharply since the 1980s.

Back in 1983, for example, the CDC recommended only ten vaccines for children from birth through six years old (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/images/schedule1983s.jpg). Today, that number has risen significantly to 29 vaccines and counting, many of which are now administered all at one time or in combinations like the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine (http://www.cdc.gov).

And yet the mainstream medical system and its allies in the government and media are willfully ignoring this glaring fact, blaming "unknown" causes and "genetics" for causing autism, which are the two most common catch-all scapegoats. And in explaining the drastic rise in autism rates over the years, the talking heads actually claim that there is no rise -- the seemingly elevated autism rates are merely the result of improved autism screening methods that are now identifying more cases.

Vaccines, fluoride, MSG, GMOs, toxic chemicals, processed foods -- the real causes of autism


Sadly, these laughably unscientific excuses for this epidemic condition are actually being taken seriously by many people, while the true causes of autism -- vaccines, fluoridated water, monosodium glutamate (MSG), genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), toxic chemicals, and processed foods -- continue to remain taboo subjects when talking about autism.

But any rational human being that takes the time to objectively investigate the science behind how autism spectrum disorders are, at the very least, spurred on by these and other toxins, will quickly realize that the ugly truth about autism is being concealed from the public. And while these factors may not cause autism symptoms in every single person that is exposed to them, they surely trigger it in many, especially when exposures are combined and persistent.

Vaccines, for instance, which the medical establishment have presumptuously declared to play absolutely no role in autism, continue to show up in independent, non-pharma-sponsored research as a cause of autism. Whether they contain thimerosal (mercury) or not, vaccines are definitively linked to neurological disorders that were largely non-existent prior to mass-vaccination campaigns.

Even the kangaroo "vaccine court" has quietly admitted this, having settled with several families whose children were injured by vaccines. Back in 2009, for instance, a vaccine court ruled that Bailey Banks, a young boy who suffered acute brain damage after getting the MMR vaccine, had indeed been injured by the vaccine. Special Master Richard Abell wrote at the time that "the MMR vaccine at issue actually caused the conditions from which Bailey suffered and continues to suffer" (http://www.ageofautism.com).

The case was one of several that has received little or no media attention, and yet it speaks volumes about the dangers associated with vaccines. It also exposes the lies of the deniers who have declared that vaccines are in no way related to autism -- case closed.

And besides vaccines, fluoridated water, MSG (http://www.msgtruth.org/autism.htm), GMOs (http://www.ageofautism.com), toxic chemicals both in the environment and in the food supply, and processed foods in general have all been linked to autism spectrum disorders as well (http://www.tacanow.org/family-resources/living-in-a-toxic-world/).

Sources for this article include:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/29/health/autism/?hpt=hp_t1

FDA ‘deleted comments’ story inaccurate

FDA ‘deleted comments’ story inaccurate by Alex Duncan

We wanted to give you a recap of last week’s exciting announcement, but we need to respond to a troubling story currently spreading on the Internet.

You may have seen a Yahoo Voices article that claims the FDA “deleted” the more than 1 million comments we submitted to the FDA last week. This story is incorrect and highly misleading.

We ask that you please not link to or share this misleading story on your websites or social media. 

If you have already linked or shared one of these stories, we ask that you please pull it down.

Here are the facts:
  • The FDA has NOT deleted the 1 million+ comments.
  • The FDA has an outdated and non-transparent system that requires organizations like JLI to submit multiple signatures as an attachment. Each upload is counted as one “comment,” even though it may in fact contain hundreds of thousands of individual comments.  Lumping signatures together in one comment and uploading to regulations.gov is the way groups have submitted comments for as long as the government has accepted electronic comments. We knew this before we started collecting comments.
  • To view all the individual comments made in these attachments, you’d need to file a Freedom of Information Act request with the FDA. Like we said, their system is not very transparent or user-friendly.  Hopefully this record-breaking number of comments will result not just in labeling of GMOs, but also changes to increase transparency in the comment collection process.
While we want to continue to apply pressure to the FDA to listen to the American people and label genetically engineered foods, we do not want to spread falsehoods or misinformation.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Just Label It justlabelit.org/takeaction
Twitter: @justlabelit
Facebook: www.facebook.com/justlabelit

Republican Paul Ryan’s Budget: Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Republican Paul Ryan’s Budget: Cruel and Unusual Punishment by Stephen Lendman

What Democrats endorse isn’t much better. Timing mostly differs to get past November elections.
For starters, Obama and Democrats agreed to the following cuts over the next decade:
  • $4 trillion overall, including:
  • $770 billion from education, environmental, transportation, and other infrastructure cuts, as well as lower wages and benefits for federal workers when they need more, not less;
  • $480 billion from Medicare and Medicaid, besides another $1 trillion from Obamacare;
  • $360 billion from mandated domestic programs, including food stamps, home heating assistance, income for the poor and disabled, federal pension insurance, and farm subsidies; and
  • $400 billion from military-related spending from unneeded weapons, as well as healthcare and other benefits for active service members and veterans.
Priority Pentagon items remain untouched to assure annual budget increases, generous supplemental add-ons, and secret open-checkbook intelligence allocations for numerous lawless purposes.

Bipartisan complicity assures people needs are on the chopping block for reduction or elimination to satisfy the insatiable appetites of Wall Street, war profiteers, other corporate favorites, and America’s super-rich. If reelected, Obama will rubber-stamp them.

Moreover, he’s on board for more, including slashing corporate and super-rich tax rates. At the same time, he OK’d Medicare co-pays increases, raising retirement age entitlements eligibility, and reducing or eliminating other vital benefits America’s poor need most.

They and ordinary Americans will be burdened to let corporations and super-rich elites end up better off than ever. Bipartisan complicity assures it.

At a time 25 million are unemployed, millions more underemployed, poverty’s at record levels, home foreclosures exceed 12 million, one in eight homeowners either face foreclosure or are past due 30 or more days, 11 million homeowners are “upside down on their mortgages,” eight million homes are either unsold or vacant, prices keep falling, unmet public needs are rising, corporate profits are at record levels, and super-rich elites are better off than ever, Republicans passed a budget inflicting more pain on households least to tolerate it.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) chairs the House Budget Committee. He wants Social Security privatized, its benefits reduced, Medicare abolished, Medicaid sharply cut, food stamps and other safety net essentials decreased, and taxes slashed for corporations and America’s super-rich.

On March 29, his proposed budget passed 228 – 191 along party lines as expected. No Democrats supported it. Ten Republicans defected. According to Ryan:

“It is so rare in American politics to arrive at a moment in which the debate revolves around the fundamental nature of American democracy and the social contract, but that is exactly where we are today. Today’s budget is a vote of confidence for the American experiment.”

For millions of vulnerable households, it’s nearly a death sentence. It harms their ability to get by, and Ryan plans more cuts. Already, income inequality and poverty are at record levels.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 62% of Ryan’s cuts come from “programs for lower-income Americans.” Over 10 years, it slashes $5.3 trillion from non-defense areas. At the same time, he allocates an additional $200 billion for defense and imperial wars with automatic add-ons annually plus unknown tens of billions in black budgets.

Specific proposed cuts include:

(1) $2.4 trillion from Medicaid and other low or moderate household income healthcare programs. Medicaid loses $810 billion. By repealing Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion and subsidies for those most in need to buy health insurance, he gets another $1.6 trillion.

(2) $1.2 trillion from programs other than Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other healthcare programs.

(3) $134 billion from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food stamp aid. If enacted, up to 10 million recipients would be entirely shut out.

(4) At least $463 billion from other programs serving America’s most needy, other than Medicaid and SNAP.

(5) At least another $291 billion in low-income discretionary programs, including Pell Grant tuition aid for needy students.

Ryan directs his cuts at vulnerable households unable to get by on what he wants reduced or eliminated. Millions will lose healthcare. Millions more won’t have enough to eat and will be dependent on what food banks provide. Education will suffer more than already. Poor students will have to forego it altogether.

Mitt Romney called it “an excellent piece of work.” Rick Santorum said it’s not enough. Households most harmed had no say. Opposition Democrats plan coming on board post-election. So does Obama with precise cuts to be agreed on then. For now, Senate Democrats will block Ryan’s plan. Post-election, they’ll go along.

Capitalism’s Cancer Stage

What’s ongoing fits John McMurtry’s explanation of capitalism’s cancer stage. He calls it “a world-system disorder which becomes cumulatively worse the longer it is unrecognised.”

Cancer’s defining nature is it “advances when not recognised by its life-host.” Its a mutant degenerate system. It’s evident in many ways. Ryan’s budget proposal is symptomatic. The problem’s much greater.
Predatory capitalism’s a “contagion” model. Its victims spread the disease. “No distinction is ever made between destructive and productive capital sequences. ‘Contagion’ conceals every moment of the cancer system at work.”

Victims are blamed for what predators cause. Few explain how Wall Street hijacked “government’s constitutional money-and-credit issue to speculate and debt-enslave others at endless costs for them and equally endless growing riches of the big banks.”

Ordinary people are scammed. They’re deprived of their rights. At the same time, Wall Street, other major financial interests, and corporate favorites are licensed to steal.

“The inner logic is very simple. The people must pay for the money-sequence cancer growth, and so more public wealth and individual savings must be taken away to do so. The principal mechanism is debt multiplication of governments and individuals managed by private banks’ issuing longterm compounding debts without the money to back the loans.”

Government, major financial interests, and other corporate giants partner for self-enrichment at the public’s expense. In the process, communities and national economies are destroyed. Predators profit on their road to ruin. Political Washington goes along.

“As in any cancer system, the life host is increasingly plundered, but the cancer is masked from immune recognition or response.”

Ryan and others like him serve wealth and power only. Hollowing out America and most households in it makes them richer and more able to plunder grab all they can, then move on to new hosts or pillage many simultaneously.

It’s not surprising that cancer became epidemic under capitalism. It thrives on illness and deplores good health.

“Yet once (it) become(s) aggressively invasive, (it’s) the blocked out by the life host at every turn on the social as well as individual plane. That is how the cancer system spreads, masking itself every move at both levels. Uncontrolled money-sequence multiplication and invasive growth into organic, social and ecological life-hosts is undeniable once the dots are joined.”

Suggesting it is taboo. Media scoundrels say nothing. Disease proliferates. Greed is its genesis. Political Washington’s on board facilitating it. Reelection and self-enrichment’s their motive.

Ryan’s a willing agent, a capitalist tool. So are most others in Congress and all presidents. The end game’s predictable. America’s heading for banana republic harshness, tyranny and ruin. Along the way, ordinary people are being trampled.

The cancer system’s at fault. A disproportionate number of America’s privileged share wealth and power. Ordinary people are exploited. Profits are privatized, debt socialized. Working households and future generations bear it.

Criminals run a kleptocracy. It’s corrupt, rotten to the core gangsterism. Politicians are in bed with business. Ordinary people haven’t a chance. Personal freedoms and other democratic values are illusions. What’s left after corporate crooks grab everything and bribe Congress and presidents to go along.

Money power runs America. Political Washington’s complicit letting it. Its criminal class is bipartisan. What can’t go on forever, won’t, but until then will transfer maximum wealth one way to those already with too much.

McMurtry’s “cancer system” explains it. This one’s likely to destroy itself along with its host, and maybe humanity in the process.

Monday, April 2, 2012

Follow the Money: BPA Makers to Gross $8 Billion Thanks to FDA Rejecting Ban

© naturalsociety.com
Follow the Money: BPA Makers to Gross $8 Billion Thanks to FDA Rejecting Ban by Anthony Gucciardi

Producers of toxic BPA are now boasting $8 billion in sales for 2012 thanks to the FDA rejecting a potential ban on the cancer-linked chemical on March 30th. According to GlobalData, manufacturers will produce 4.7 million metric tons of BPA this year to be dispersed into the daily lives of millions worldwide. BPA now goes into everything: plastic bottles, canned foods, DVDs, plastic wrap, and much more. Despite being linked to about as many serious health conditions as the amount of products it contaminates, the FDA has decided once again to side with mega corporations over protecting the health of the people.

Even Campbell’s Soup and the Heinz corporation are removing BPA from their products in an effort to reclaim consumers who are fully aware of the issues surrounding BPA. California is also banning the substance from baby bottles and sippy cups in attempts to protect newborn babies whose developing bodies are majorly affected by the estrogen-mimicking chemical. But the FDA? They recognize that BPA may be breeding disease among the public, but they’re still perfectly okay with letting it contaminate the food supply. Instead of taking action over the threat, the FDA decided to pick at the hundreds of peer-reviewed studies that have linked BPA to everything from cancer (in over 130 studies) to depression and diabetes.
“While evidence from some studies have raised questions as to whether BPA may be associated with a variety of health effects, there remain serious questions about these studies, particularly as they relate to humans,” the FDA says.
This is the same agency that has no trouble going after nutritional supplements containing 100% organic and natural super-nutrients that have been used for thousands of years. It is also the same government powerhouse that has allowed for mercury to lurk in the processed food supply for years despite major consumer groups demanding action. The list can go on and on — the FDA simply does not seem to care about legitimately threatening items like GMOs and artificial sweeteners, so why would they care about BPA? After all, the carcinogenic chemical has the backing of an $8 billion industry.

Bitter Seeds: The Plight of India's Farmers (Trailer)

Bitter Seeds: The Plight of India's Farmers (Trailer) - GRTV



Bitter Seeds explores the future of how we grow things, weighing in on the worldwide debate over the changes created by industrial agriculture. Companies like the U.S.-based Monsanto claim that their genetically modified (GM) seeds offer the most effective solution to feeding the world’s growing population, but on the ground, many small-scale farmers are losing their land. Nowhere is the situation more desperate than in India, where an epidemic of farmer suicides has claimed over a quarter million lives. Every 30 minutes one farmer in India, deep in debt and unable to provide for his family, commits suicide.

Following a U.S. complaint to the World Trade Organization, India had to open its doors to foreign seed companies. Within a few years, multinational corporations had taken over India’s seed market in a number of major crops. Now only GM seeds are available at the shops, requiring India’s farmers to pay an annual royalty. The GM seeds are much more expensive; they need additional fertilizers and insecticides and must be re-purchased every season. While large farms have prospered, the majority of farmers find it increasingly more difficult to make a living off their land.

Bitter Seeds follows a season in a village at the epicenter of the crisis, from sowing to harvest. Like most of his neighbors, cotton-farmer Ram Krishna must borrow heavily in order to afford the mounting costs of modern farming. Required by a money-lender to put up his land as collateral, he gambles on everything he has.

When his crop is attacked by pests, Ram Krishna must do whatever he can to avoid losing the family land. Adding to his burden is another duty – his daughter has reached marrying age, and he must find the money for an expensive dowry. Ram Krishna has just become a candidate for joining the ranks of the farmers who commit suicide in despair.

Weaving in and out of Ram Krishna’s story is that of his neighbor’s daughter. Manjusha, a college student, is determined to become a journalist and tell the world about the farmers’ predicament. Her family opposes her plans, which go against village traditions. Manjusha’s ambition is also fueled by her personal history – her father was one of the suicide victims. When a newspaper reporter agrees to look at her writing, Manjusha takes on Ram Krishna’s plight as her first reporting project. Armed with a small camera from the production team, her video becomes part of the film.

The film follows the seeds salesmen from the remote village in the state of Maharashtra to their company’s headquarters. Interviews with seed industry executives (including Monsanto’s) and their critic, Vandana Shiva, flesh out the debate.

Bitter Seeds features compelling characters to tell a deeply moving story from the heart of the worldwide controversy about the future of farming.

“Films like this can change the world.” – Alice Waters

“A tragedy for our times, beautifully told, deeply disturbing.” – Michael Pollan

“Better than a Batman movie…with real villains making up their own lines.” — Peter Sellars

Meat Industry to Retaliate for Pink Slime Exposure with Higher Prices; USDA and FDA Escape Scrutiny

image source
Meat Industry to Retaliate for Pink Slime Exposure with Higher Prices; USDA and FDA Escape Scrutiny by Heather Callaghan and Michael Edwards

Beef Products International (BPI) is facing their biggest public relations disaster yet.

The people have spoken and want nothing to do with their flowery sounding "lean finely textured beef." Kroger Co. chain has added itself to the growing "We do not carry Pink Slime" list as well as countless delis reassuring customers on their signs.

BPI is closing three out of their four branches in Amarillo, Texas; Garden City, Kansas; and Waterloo, Iowa -- South Sioux City, Nebraska will remain open. BPI has one month to placate customers or possibly vanish forever. One month to undue 20 years of silent profit. Profit from supermarkets, fast food chains, and school cafeterias.

But what about the real foxes in the hen house -- the USDA and FDA?  And what will happen to the price of "healthy" meat?

America's food regulatory agencies approved, as safe, meat trimmings not fit for animal feed that will only preclude death by food poisoning if first soaked in ammonia -- which is poisonous and not effective against all pathogens, especially newer resistant ones.

Robert Menendez told Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, "The leftover scraps...come from parts of the cow with high exposure to fecal matter."

 So the USDA graciously gives school lunch programs the option of not buying meat with filler that literally is not considered fit to feed dogs only after petitions with hundreds of thousands of signatures begged them to remove it. Unlike the producers of pink slime, the regulatory agencies themselves have escaped media scrutiny -- they aren't closing any branches. No PR disaster for them, even though they waved it in for school children as adequate for their nutritional guidelines.

But the truth is, it is not meant for human consumption. Period. And no amount of PR painting can undue the damage of people's trust in the current food industry.

The Threat

This exposure is already leading to higher meat prices, and there are signs that the beef industry is set to retaliate against an awakening public.  A piece in USA Today entitled, "Beef Industry Braces for Loss of 'Pink Slime' Filler" reads more like a beef industry press release as it refers to the hazardous material as a "low-fat beef product" that has been essentially victimized by social media, as if there is not ample evidence to back up the public outcry.  An inset image of a BPI worker and his family reads:
The Licons are just one of many families who face an uncertain future after Beef Products International suspended operations at its Holcomb, Kan., plant.
While this outcome is unfortunate, it is quite a bit more unfortunate that the product itself was ever allowed onto the table of countless millions without their knowledge about what they were actually eating.

The USA Today report goes on to emphasize that social media is the culprit in all of this, adding nothing factual to refute what the public has come to understand:
'This shows the impact of the social media,' said Kevin Concannon, former director of the Iowa Department of Human Services and now Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services. 'There is absolutely no evidence that this product is unsafe, and it is low-fat.'
Those comments are nothing more than a desperate attempt to redirect the argument as an appeal to people's programmed positive response toward anything deemed "low-fat," as if the poisonous ammonia bath it receives should be dismissed as a natural consequence of offering something that is ultimately healthy. Moreover, this refrain was echoed by the industry itself, giving further credence to "fat free" being a propaganda point:
'It’s crazy,' said Des Moines meat wholesale Phil Barber of Brewer Meats, which he said has not knowingly used meat with the filler. Barber nonetheless said of the fillings, 'they’re free of E. coli, and they’re 95 percent fat free.' (Source)
Beef prices are just coming off all-time highs, and it appears that the industry will use this scandal as justification for surging prices in its wake.  According to a spokesperson for the Hy-Vee supermarket chain:
'The industry is telling us that the removal of this filler is the equivalent of losing 1.5 million head of cattle, and cattle already are in tight supply,' said Hy-Vee spokeswoman Ruth Comer. Hy-Vee is pulling ground beef with the 'lean finely textured trimmings,' also referred pejoratively as pink slime, from its shelves.
And, again, there is a thinly veiled condemnation of the now-educated consumer.  But it certainly sounds like something positive for commodity traders such as Dennis Smith of Archer Financial Services in Chicago:
'Long term the refusal by consumers to use this product (lean finely textured beef) will make less beef available and force prices higher. If that’s what the consumer wants, that’s what they’ll get,' Smith said.
So, how many schools will actually opt out of buying pink slime in the face of rising prices? My best guess based on having worked in the public school system and viewing how schools go for the lowest bid on lunch foods -- most schools will not opt out if they have to pay one penny more for slimeless meat. Food quality is one of the first casualties of budget issues.

For the first year of this scandal, they will tell concerned parents that they've already ordered next year's food based on their allotted budget. The next year, if the buzz hasn't died down, they will wait until there is an outcry and then bemoan the higher meat prices.

A similar scenario played out in last season's Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution after he tirelessly overhauled a cafeteria with healthy fresh foods for the same price. He came back to find them serving garbage again. A school lunch program minion also forced him to serve french fries because his seven-veggie pasta only counted as one vegetable according to their guidelines!

Why We Should Laugh At Price Threats

Here's a thought: higher meat prices will put typical staph-infected, radiated hormone-pumped beef neck in neck with grass-fed organic beef prices -- that, amazingly, for all the care that goes into the real happy cows, has only cost a few dollars more per pound this whole time. Grass-fed producers will not be affected by these price hikes -- they've never used filler and their prices are based on the care that goes into their stock. So why pay more for less when the same dollar amount can bring real nutrition?

Our current food mafia is losing ground as the ugly truth continues to spread. If you watched, read, researched, talked about, signed petitions, or shared this food fiasco with anyone -- you're an activist, not a wet blanket! The agencies that take our money to give us poison and call it nutrition should be ashamed, not us.

We vote with our forks -- Decentralize!

Read other articles by Heather Callaghan and Michael Edwards here.

You can support this article by voting on Reddit:  http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/rpraq/meat_industry_to_retaliate_for_pink_slime/

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Hang onto your DNA - the 1% wants that, too

© foodfreedomgroup.com
Hang onto your DNA - the 1% wants that, too by Scott Johnson

First, they took your manufacturing, then your jobs, then your homes, then the whole economy. Next, they got more physically personal and took the food that goes into your body and genetically engineered it and, in doing so, they took your health. They are also going after all land and resources and your labor (an undeclared part of UN Agenda 21, which they wrote).

But all that is not enough. They want more of what is yours and they are going even deeper.

They want to take over your DNA.

They can do this with the new DNA vaccines. They are injecting genetically engineered PATENTED material into people. That means not only that they are altering people's very code of life (for the first time in all of existence, forcing their synthetic genetically engineered material into the person's DNA), but after doing so they can make commercial patent claims on what is inside people's bodies. This is just what Monsanto is doing to farmers after it contaminates their organic fields. They could make claims over blood, organs, whatever, because DNA with their patented intellectual property is in it all.

And this is the intent.

Never mind they didn't let anyone know about this. Never mind these vaccines are mandated to children and college students, and they are trying to do so now with nurses as a requirement for their job.

Never mind this is highly deceptive commercial theft of a person's organic - perfect - DNA.

This is mandated theft.

But more, it is mandated rape of one biologic heritage, as surely as if a rapist were allowed to forcibly impregnate a woman against her will and got her pregnant. In both cases, the new DNA is there to be handed down. Only in the case of the DNA vaccines, it is not only the one unborn child who will carry the rapist's DNA. With DNA vaccines, the person raped by them is themselves stuck with corporate patented DNA and affected medically by it, AND as are ALL children they may ever have. And there is no way to "abort" it.

Would anyone in their right mind turn their child's perfect DNA over to the pharmaceutical industry to have them inject patented material into it when they might make commercial claims over the child's body in the future? Would any caring parent do that just to avoid minor childhood diseases such as measles or mumps or rubella? Were kids dying like flies from these minor diseases before vaccines or did they routinely catch them and miss a few days of school, ending up with permanent immunity? But today, they are risking brain damage and death from the vaccines themselves. But even if they survive, every child who is forced to take these DNA vaccine products, are no longer are the owners of their own DNA.

The government has a vested interest in the vaccines, including patents.
  1. The U.S. Government gives tax money to Researchers who can develop a profitable drug or vaccine technology.

  2. The U.S. Government then patents the technology, drug, or vaccine.

  3. The U.S. Government then licenses the patent to Pharmaceutical Companies.

  4. The U.S. Government then declares the product is "Safe and Effective."

  5. The U.S. Government then gets a cut of the profits from the drug or vaccine.

  6. The U.S. Government then passes laws that protects these companies from lawsuits.

  7. The U.S. Government then uses TAX DOLLARS to buy drugs for free distribution to increase profits for drug company stockholders like John McCain ($25,000,000.00), George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld (former Board of Directors for Gilead Sciences (TAMIFLU)), ........

  8. The U.S Government is involved in RACKETEERING, at the expense of human life, and should be treated as any other street corner drug peddler.
What the government and corporations do not inform parents is that there are and have been complete cures for ALL infectious diseases and that vaccines are obsolete.

Intelligent life across the Milky Way - why 200 billion stars can't be lifeless

Intelligent life across the Milky Way - why 200 billion stars can't be lifeless by Mike Adams

 (NaturalNews) My article published yesterday about 56 billion "habitable" planets in the Milky Way galaxy touched a nerve with a few people on Facebook (http://www.naturalnews.com/035420_human_beings_invasive_species_intel...). They apparently believe that, yes, there is a Creator who created our universe, and yes, that intelligence created 200 - 400 billion stars in the Milky Way galaxy alone (not to mention all the other galaxies), but then for some bizarre reason God only created life on ONE planet! Earth!

© n/a
It is truly astonishing that there are still people living on this planet who hold such a limited, flat-Earth view of reality. If there's anything we've learned about Mother Nature, it's that life is everywhere -- even in places you wouldn't expect it such as frozen ice or boiling-hot ocean vents.

If Earth is the only planet in the universe upon which life exists, what would be the point of creating billions of galaxies, each with billions of planets? Are these all just to serve as interesting dots in the sky, all to amuse just one single "chosen" race of intelligent beings known as humankind? Nonsense!

Many intelligent races no doubt think they are the center of the universe, too


Interestingly, however, this is probably a common phenomenon among all the races of intelligent beings across our galaxy who look to the sky and think to themselves, "WE must be the only ones here!" There is an anthropocentric tendency among all living creatures, I submit, because each consciousness only experiences the universe from their own individuated point of view. Here on Earth, we joke that teenagers think they are the center of the universe; but the real joke is that much of our adult population quite literally still believes the exact same thing.

I am glad that the vast majority of NaturalNews readers are intelligent, informed, open-minded and have a "big picture" view of reality. They actually appreciate these discussions of the greater universe, consciousness, and the acknowledgement that Mother Nature has left her mark not merely on this one water planet we call Earth, but almost certainly throughout the entire galaxy wherever life may be sustained (and that's a LOT of places).

I cannot imagine living with the belief that the great expanse of the entire universe is dead and lifeless. That sounds not just spiritually empty but physically impossible. How can life NOT start on other water planets when the seeds of life (DNA, amino acids, water, minerals and more) are being flung across the universe in every instant thanks to meteorites and comets slamming into planets? Earth is currently made of pieces of Mars, and Mars, in turn, is made from pieces of Earth.

Pieces of Earth right now reside on the Moon, and every molecule of water that now exists on our planet was brought here from some other planet or comet! Our home is, in a very real sense, a collage of elements, metals, liquids and the seeds of life gathered here from (literally) across the galaxy, warmed by the sun, "blessed" into a life-supporting habitat through the miracle of nuclear fusion.

Even the stuff you are made of -- carbon atoms, water, lipids -- is composed of elements created in the transmutational explosions of dying stars. "We're made of star stuff," the physicist Carl Sagan once said, and he was right. But what the physicists are still missing, of course, is the element of consciousness across the universe. Because a mass of star stuff alone just equals a pile of rock and metals; but humans clearly have consciousness as an added element in the recipe. (And so do all life forms across the universe, by the way, including animals and plants.)

To think that life exists only on Earth is the ultimate pessimism. It is, in essence, to believe we are already living in Hell.

In the end, I suppose the belief that Earth is the only planet in the entire universe with intelligent life comes from a self-delusional belief that "We alone are special." Well of course we're special. And so are all the other living, conscious beings that share our universe. We're all special! The fact that this universe even supports life is, itself, a fantastic anomaly. Do you realize that if the laws of physics were tweaked ever so slightly, stars would not be able to use hydrogen as nuclear fuel? No fuel means no suns. No suns equals no habitable planets. Total darkness and death.

And yet, that is not THIS universe! This universe is alive, it is abundant, it is diverse and huge beyond imagination. We are but one intelligent species among billions. Not only are we not alone, but the very idea that we could possibly BE alone is incomprehensible.

A Must See Documentary

A Must See Documentary - corbettreport

Editor's note: While American news (M$M) is focused on self ignorance as the theme of what is thought of life, bound to its hatred for its useless power, learning about our emotions holds with others in the concourse of living the passion necessary to understand our vulnerabilities are real and that writing them is part of self-remembering which brings the prophet and the mentac to course.



James takes a minute out of his picnic lunch among the non-blooming cherry blossoms of western Japan to recommend a must-see documentary to his viewers. Watch the documentary here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=armP8TfS9Is&list=PL1D6A31612BFFD467&fe...

Stealth GMOs Rapidly Consuming Global Food Supply

© naturalsociety.com
Stealth GMOs Rapidly Consuming Global Food Supply by Anthony Gucciardi

 Obviously there is no room for GMOs in truly healthy food products, which is why it is truly vital that you understand the nature of GMOs and how they are oftentimes hidden in commercial food products. It may very well shock you to know just how prevalent GMOs are within the food supply. It’s truly amazing that modified products continue to go unlabeled despite being linked to organ damage — among a barrage of other conditions — in a prominent review of 19 studies.

In fact, nearly 93-95% of US soybeans are genetically modified in order to resist powerful weed-killers that were found to be killing the actual soybeans as well as the weeds. Following current trends, genetically modified food products will makeup the majority of the future food supply if a change is not made. For now, that change has been shot down by the FDA — the very organization tasked to defend public health. Just recently, the agency deleted around 1 million signatures from the GMO labeling campaign ‘Just Label It.’

This move means that consumers will continue to stay in the dark about whether or not what they’re eating is compromised of genetically modified ingredients. And it’s not just corn and soybeans, other commonly modified food staples include:
  • Corn
  • Cotton
  • Soy
  • Sweet corn
  • Hawaiian Papaya
  • Rice
  • Potatoes
Statistics show how GMO crops and ingredients have skyrocketed in even the past few years. Here are statistics as of 2009-2010:
  • Genetically modified soybeans currently make up for 93-95% of the US soybean supply.
  • Genetically modified corn currently makes up for 86% of the US corn supply.
  • Genetically modified cotton currently makes up for 93% of the US cotton supply.
  • Genetically modified canola currently makes up for 93% of the soybean supply.
  • Genetically modified Hawaiin papaya currently makes up for 93% of the Hawaiian papaya supply.
When viewing these statistics, it is easy to see how many consumers are being tricked into consuming genetically modified foods. Amazingly, in a poll conducted by ABC, more than 93% of Americans feel that products containing GMOs should be labeled – meanwhile, these individuals are actually unknowingly consuming GMOs on a daily basis. What it comes down to is that as long as the threat is not visible, many consumers will simply purchase commercial products without thinking about the consequences. This is exactly why Monsanto and others have been squelching attempts to label products that contain GMOs.

This post is an excerpt from the ‘Genetically Modified Foods: How to Avoid & Identify’ section in my new book on natural health, The New Health Paradigm.