Saturday, August 4, 2012

The Hygiene Hypothesis – Can Being too Clean Harm Your Health?

© naturalsociety.com
The Hygiene Hypothesis – Can Being too Clean Harm Your Health?
Aug 4, 2012 | Elizabeth Renter

There are all sorts of recommendations out there telling us when to wash our hands: before we eat, before we cook, after we shake hands, after touching something that has been touched by someone else – it seems that we as a society are simple washing too much. Others don’t leave the house without anti-bacterial gel or spray and classrooms often contain a near-chemical bath of soaps and germ-killers. But in all of this hype of being germ-free, are we actually harming our health? Research says yes, and the issue is today known as the hygiene hypothesis.

The Hygiene Hypothesis – Can You be too Clean?

A study looked at the effects of BPA and a soap-agent called triclosan found both actually suppressed the immune system of adults.

Bisphenol A (BPA) is not new to controversy. The chemical was recently banned by the FDA for inclusion in baby bottles, but it remains in plastic food containers and in the linings of some canned foods. Among other things, it stands accused of disrupting hormones, increasing risk of diabetes and cancer, and negatively affecting the immune system.

See here for the latest news on BPA: NaturalSociety

But triclosan is something that we don’t hear of often.

Triclosan is found in cleaning agents and soap, often those touting an anti-bacterial label. It is added to reduce bacterial contamination, but while the FDA says the substance is not currently considered hazardous, they admit that some valuable studies have linked it with several different problems.

Young people, aged 18 and younger, who were exposed to higher levels of the chemical were found to be more likely to have hay fever and allergies.

According to the study’s co-author, “The triclosan findings in the younger age groups may support the hygiene hypothesis which maintains that living in very clean and hygienic environments may impact our exposure to micro-organisms that are beneficial for development of the immune system.”

The immune system learns how to fight illness and disease by being exposed to it; it then builds defenses. When we don’t allow our immune systems to have any exposure to these micro-organisms, it doesn’t know how to fight them—leaving us vulnerable.

Additional studies have also linked triclosan to hormone regulation disruption, potentially suppressing thyroid function and reducing testosterone levels. It is also said to “amplify the effects of sex hormones such as estrogen and testosterone,” potentially increasing the risks of breast and prostate tumors.

Further supporting the hygiene hypothesis, in a research project entitled the Human Microbiome Project, researchers show that bacteria and microbial bodies are actually much more beneficial than they will ever be detrimental. Not only do bacteria keep people alive and healthful by helping to strengthen the immune system, but they also explain in a broad sense why people are so different when it comes to vaccinations and diseases.

While no one wants to contract the common cold or flu, and we all like clean hands, washing with regular soap and water will do the trick, though buying organic consumer products is the best way to avoid all harmful chemicals. Research has shown that those listed as “anti-bacterial” (frequently containing triclosan) are no more effective than regular soap and water and may be much more dangerous.

Additional Sources:

HuffingtonPost
FDA.gov
DailyMail

Most Palestinian children suffer shell shock

Most Palestinian children suffer shell shock 
Aug 4, 2012 |



Psychology reports show that 41 percent of Palestinian children suffer from PTSD as a consequence of the brutal Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) also known as 'shell shock' or 'battle fatigue syndrome' is a serious mental condition, which is a lasting consequence of traumatic ordeals that cause intense fear, helplessness, or horror.

Press TV has interviewed Dr. Lina Geha, psychologist at the Palestine Trauma Center about the state of trauma inflicted on the population of Palestine with particularly focus on the children by the Israeli occupiers.

Artificial Butter Flavoring Ingredient Penetrates Blood-Brain Barrier

© preventdisease.com
Artificial Butter Flavoring Ingredient Penetrates Blood-Brain Barrier
Aug 3, 2012 | April McCarthy

Scientists are beginning to understand one of life's enduring mysteries - Diacetyl (DA) is a chemical that imparts the buttery flavour in microwave popcorn. It has a disease named after it because many microwave popcorn factory workers exposed to it have developed a lung condition called diacetyl-induced bronchiolitis obliterans or "Popcorn worker's lung". New evidence found that DA intensifies the damaging effects of an abnormal brain protein linked to Alzheimer’s disease.

 A new study raises concern about chronic exposure of workers in industry to the food flavoring ingredient used to produce the distinctive buttery flavor and aroma of microwave popcorn, margarines, snack foods, candy, baked goods, pet foods and other products. The study appears in ACS’ journal Chemical Research in Toxicology.

Robert Vince and colleagues Swati More and Ashish Vartak explain that DA has been the focus of much research recently because it is linked to respiratory and other problems in workers at microwave popcorn and food-flavoring factories. DA gives microwave popcorn its distinctive buttery taste and aroma. DA also forms naturally in fermented beverages such as beer, and gives some chardonnay wines a buttery taste. Vince’s team realized that DA has an architecture similar to a substance that makes beta-amyloid proteins clump together in the brain -- clumping being a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease. So they tested whether DA also could clump those proteins.

DA did increase the level of beta-amyloid clumping. At real-world occupational exposure levels, DA also enhanced beta-amyloid’s toxic effects on nerve cells growing in the laboratory. Other lab experiments showed that DA easily penetrated the so-called “blood-brain barrier,” which keeps many harmful substances from entering the brain. DA also stopped a protective protein called glyoxalase I from safeguarding nerve cells. “In light of the chronic exposure of industry workers to DA, this study raises the troubling possibility of long-term neurological toxicity mediated by DA,” say the researchers.

David Michaels, of the George Washington University School of Public Health, said the finding is another reason for federal regulators to crack down on diacetyl exposure by workers and consumers.

"This letter is a red flag, suggesting that exposure to food flavor chemicals is not just killing workers, but may also be causing disease in people exposed to food flavor chemicals in their kitchens," Michaels wrote on his public health policy blog.

April McCarthy is a community journalist playing an active role reporting and analyzing world events to advance our health and eco-friendly initiatives.

Comment: Diacetylmorphine is called heroin and morphine is associated with anesthesia, and the arguments about what is actually occurring.

Unknown Secrets of the Asiatic Cheetah

Unknown Secrets of the Asiatic Cheetah
Courtesy Reference Library | Red Orbit

The Asiatic cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus venaticus) is a rare critically endangered subspecies of the cheetah found primarily in Iran. It is an atypical member of the cat family (Felidae) that hunts by speed rather than by stealth or pack tactics. It lives in a vast fragmented desert and although recently extinct in India it is also known as the Indian cheetah. It is the fastest of all land animals and can reach speeds of up to 70 mph (112 km/h). The cheetah is well known for its amazing acceleration.

Description

The cheetah has a slender slim body and broad chest and a highly set abdomen, which resembles a hound. It has a small, domed head with a short nose and small ears. The eyes are set high up on the skull. A pair of distinct black “tear marks” runs from the corners of the eyes, down the sides of the nose to the mouth. This possibly keeps the sun out of their eyes, which benefits hunting.

The cheetah’s back coat is light yellow to yellowish-amber and the underbody-coat is creamy white. They have full circular black spots with relatively short coarse fur. In adults, the very tip of the tail has two rings instead of spots, with the last ring the widest. Unlike other cats, adult cheetahs have dull, semi-retractable claws. Until about the first six months of their lives, the young are able to retract their claws. They can weigh from 75 to 119 lb (34 to 54 kg), but the male is slightly larger than the female.

PHOTO CREDIT: Copyright © 2003-2004 Iranian Cheetah Society (ICS)

Comment: Cypripedium is the legendary birthplace of Aphrodite and a connection to Venus. It is linguistically associated with the antipodes, however, this word is spliting it into parts as a way to describe the brain in two ways, the one below is the cheetah eating its prey, and the one above is a Soviet Republic. Douglas Adams always said the secret of the universe was 42. I think maybe he is right. Learn more about your brain at KnowingTest

The Real Cause of Mass Shootings and Why Gun Control Will Never Work

The Real Cause of Mass Shootings and Why Gun Control Will Never Work
Aug 4, 2012 | Andrew Puhanic

There has been considerable debate throughout the United States whether the government should enforce more stringent gun control policies on ordinary citizens.

Due to the recent mass shooting in the Aurora movie theatre, the globalists and opponents of gun ownership and the second amendment in the United States have capitalized on the emotion of a grieving nation to push their false agenda.

People deceptively blame guns as the root cause of mass shootings such as the one in the Aurora movie theatre and Port Arthur Australia to push their brainwashed ideological agenda that guns kill people.

The cause of these devastating mass shootings is not how easily accessible guns are, but rather that they are the direct result of a lack of adequate mental healthcare and the glorification of violence.

Of the most recent mass shooting, the fundamental root cause can be attributed to mental illness and not the accessibility of firearms. In a report commissioned by the United Nations in 2002, it was revealed that on average only 4.1% of total health budgets worldwide was spent on mental health.



In 2011, the World Health Organization publicized that average global spending on mental health was less than US$3 per person per year. In low income countries, expenditure can be as little as US$0.25 per person per year, according to the World Health Organization's Mental Health Atlas 2011.

 In the United States alone between 2009 and 2011, most states cut $1.8 billion from their budgets for mental health services, according to a report released by the National Alliance on Mental Illness. The report also revealed that two-thirds of states significantly reduced spending for services on children and adults living with mental illness.

Even more shocking is that 5.6 million to 8 million Americans age 65 and older have a mental health condition or substance abuse disorder.

With such low levels of funding for institutions, services and programs that treat mental illnesses, how can we expect to live in a safe world when people who need treatment are systematically ignored?

Therefore, arguments for more stringent gun control are deceptive because the root cause of all problems associated with guns is not being addressed.

Considering that the lack of funding and poor treatment of mental illness is the major contributing factor for most mass shootings, the glorification of guns in video games and the media must also be considered to be a contributing factor.

Think about it: People are meant to possess guns to protect themselves (or for sport), yet children as young as 5 years old are being exposed to guns in a manner by which makes them fun, entertaining, and connected to aggressive actions.

95% of children and young adults who play video games that are heavily violent understand that guns are dangerous and must be handled with care; however, it’s the other 5% that don’t understand this simple message.

Parents who don’t teach their children how to respect guns, and instead allow them to be desensitized by the violence and gore of video games should realize the error of their ways.

 Final Remarks


Guns don’t kill people; people who are mentally unwell kill people.

The government and globalists would have you believe that more stringent gun control policies would reduce mass shooting episodes and make the world a safer place.

The truth is that more investment in mental health programs would reduce mass shooting episodes and provide the essential services people suffering from mental illness so desperately need.

Unfortunately, governments don’t want to invest the necessary resources into treating mental illness. Governments believe that investing in mental health won’t get them elected, and instead would rather convince you that the only reason mass shooting occur is solely because of guns and nothing else.

You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE

Andrew Puhanic is the founder of the Globalist Report. The aim of the Globalist Report is to provide current, relevant and informative information about the Globalists and Globalist Agenda. You can contact Andrew directly by visiting the Globalist Report

Comment: This article is key to understanding the psychological warfare, and I've added "autobahn," to the analecta which is representative of the concept of the weapon and the principles that a field exist in our minds related to autoimmunity. This can be sorted out on your mother board by addressing the roots beginning with woman at gwen- through profile at gwhi- at KnowingTest

Mainstream media pushes malicious fluoride lie: Fluoride-free bottled water is harming children, they claim!

© unknown
Mainstream media pushes malicious fluoride lie: Fluoride-free bottled water is harming children, they claim!
Aug 3, 2012 | Mike Adams

(NaturalNews) The mainstream media is at it again, lying to the public about fluoride. This time, the culprit is HealthDay, a "canned news" service that spits out lies and disinformation to be published by subscribing websites. Recently, HealthDay put out a story by author Alan Mozes claiming that bottled water might be harming children's dental health because there's no fluoride in it! (http://consumer.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=667053)

And to really push their lie, they print the following conglomeration of total disinfo:

A salt formed from the combination of fluorine and soil and rock minerals, fluoride is voluntarily added by the vast majority of states and/or local municipalities...

This statement is, of course, a complete fabrication. The so-called "fluoride" actually added to municipal water supplies does not come from soil and rock minerals; it comes from industrial waste facilities and phosphate mining scrubbers: http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=905DEA3798062673BC2C54E981BC8F07.

Much of it is imported from chemical companies in China, and it often contains over 100 different chemicals -- including radioactive elements -- which aren't even fluoride!
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=670D87333DF262F0EFE6422816901CC1

These toxic chemicals are so highly corrosive that they eat metal, undercover footage reveals:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=A836C957ADAE569341FC01576B3D1A10

See the bizarre history of fluoride:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=A8E93E45C42846D11FBE0E3A4B1355A2

See this interview with Fluoride Free Austin:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=BF2117A48DC2BA5F8DC55872E2591A9B

Mandatory, not voluntary!


Even worse, HealthDay tries to make fluoride sound like something everybody wants by saying it is "voluntarily added by the vast majority of states..."

This is a lie as well. Fluoride is mandatory in the water for those people who are unfortunate to live in a fluoridated area. They never "volunteered" to have fluoride in their water. They were never given a choice. To write that fluoride is "voluntarily added" -- against the will of many members of the public -- is wholly deceptive. To people turning on their tap water, fluoride is mandatory!

Saying that fluoride is "voluntary" is like saying breathing air pollution is voluntary, too, because chemical plants "voluntarily" spew toxic pollution into the air. Such word choice is highly deceptive journalism, if you can even call it journalism. (It's really just blatant propaganda.)

And, again, it's not even fluoride to begin with; it's a toxic cocktail of industrial waste chemicals. Nevertheless, this completely dishonest, lying news story by HealthDay was republished by:

• US News & World Report
• iVillage.com
• Phys.org
• Health24.com
• Newsday.com, with the lying, deceptive title "Bottled water might harm kids' teeth." (http://newyork.newsday.com/news/health/bottled-water-might-harm-kids-...)

... and many other "mainstream" news sites which are little more than chemical pushers that poison the population and sell out to a corporate agenda.

The real story on bottled water


What HealthDay didn't report, of course, is that parents choose bottled water largely because they want to avoid the toxic fluoride found in tap water.

• People buy water filters with special "fluoride removal filters" specifically to take the fluoride out!

• Many restaurants now advertise their water as being "filtered, fluoride-free water."

• Everywhere across America, informed people are saying they want NO FLUORIDE in their water.

Ever wonder why? According to recent research published by Harvard University, consuming fluoride lowers your IQ. Yep, fluoride makes you stupid.

Harvard University researchers wrote, "The children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ than those who lived in low fluoride areas. ...Fluoride may cause neurotoxicity in animal models and acute fluoride poisoning causes neurotoxicity in adults, very little is known of its effects on children's neurodevelopment."

Even the EPA says fluoride is a chemical "with substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity." (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harvard-study-finds-fluoride-lowers-...)

"It's senseless to keep subjecting our children to this ongoing fluoridation experiment to satisfy the political agenda of special-interest groups," says attorney Paul Beeber, NYSCOF President (www.FluorideAction.net) "Even if fluoridation reduced cavities, is tooth health more important than brain health? It's time to put politics aside and stop artificial fluoridation everywhere," says Beeber.

The bottom line


People want bottled water to be free of chemicals like fluoride. Only uninformed, ignorant people purchase bottled water with added fluoride. Parents who feed their babies fluoridated bottled water are poisoning their babies with a neurotoxin that will make them stupid.

HealthDay wants to make you stupid. Drink more fluoride, lower your IQ, and you too can work for a mainstream media news disinformation publisher whose articles advocate the mass poisoning of the American people.

Prozac is 18% fluoride


Above all, remember this: What you are seeing in this push for fluoride in bottled water is a desperate attempt by globalist controlled to make sure that people cannot avoid the mind-numbing effects of fluoride. The availability of clean, filtered bottled water has angered the globalists because it gives people a way to avoid consuming fluoride chemicals. This, in turn, causes more people to awaken from their mind-numbed slumber and start questioning the world around them.

Yes, Prozac is 18.4% fluoride, by molecular weight. Luvox is 17.9% fluoride. Paxil is 6.1% fluoride. All these drugs numb your mind, using fluoride as the key element that reacts with your brain tissue.

When you drink fluoride, you're not only being poisoned with toxic chemicals and radioactive elements, you are numbing your mind to reality, pushing yourself into a "zombie" state in which you'll believe almost anything you read. Even including mainstream media news stories.

Get informed about fluoride


www.FluorideAlert.org
www.FluorideFreeAustin.com
www.FluorideAction.net
www.IAOMT.org
www.ToxicFluoride.com

Comment: I've added the important analecta "keys," which is a cross over between the organic ketones, things that seem to be a body or field and the famous keynesian garbage control mechanisms and the defiance of the people called "Kishke," a cytokine mechanism that may be instituted by element #9 and element #11. When you take the most electron-negative and reactive element in the universe and mix it with the abasia sodium, adhoc stations may appear inside the body. I think these are principally to kill the paleo movement.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Vaporizing Super-Earths Provides Better Understanding Of Exoplanets

Image Caption: The exoplanet Corot-7b is so close
to its Sun-like host star that it must
experience extreme conditions. Credit: ESO/L. Calçada
Vaporizing Super-Earths Provides Better Understanding Of Exoplanets
Aug 3, 2012 | Red Orbit

Lee Rannals for redOrbit.com – Your Universe Online

Scientists collaborated recently to produce simulations of Earth-like planets being vaporized in order to help astronomers have a better grasp of what to look for in the atmosphere of candidate super-Earths.

Super-Earths are rocky exoplanets that are more massive than Earth, but less massive than Neptune. Most of those that have been found so far orbit very close to their stars.

Scientists writing in The Astrophysical Journal show that Earth-like planets as hot as those crowding their host star’s space would have atmospheres composed mostly of steam and carbon dioxide, with smaller amounts of other gases that could be used to distinguish one planetary composition from another.

The team converted the gas abundances and have calculated them into synthetic spectra, so astronomers hunting planets would be able to compare spectra they measure.

Planet hunting techniques allow astronomers to both identify exoplanets, and measure their average density.
Combining the average density plus theoretical models allows astronomers to determine the bulk chemical composition of gas giants.

If astronomers can observe the light from the star filtered by the planet’s atmosphere, then they can determine the composition of the planet’s atmosphere, which allows them to distinguish alternative bulk planetary compositions.

The team modeled the atmospheres of hot super-Earths because they are what astronomers are finding. The researchers said they wanted to predict what astronomers should be looking for when they look at the atmospheres to decipher the nature of the planet.

The scientists ran calculations on two types of super-Earths, one with a composition like that of the Earth‘s continental crust, and the other with a composition like the Earth’s before the continental crust formed.

The difference between the two models created by the team is water. The Earth’s continental crust is dominated by granite, which has to have water in order for it to be made. Without water, planets end up with a basaltic crust like that found on Venus.

Both crusts are mostly silicon and oxygen, but a basaltic crust like Venus is richer in elements like iron and magnesium.

The super-Earths used as references by the team are thought to have surface temperatures ranging from 520 to 3,090 degrees Fahrenheit.

Using thermodynamic equilibrium calculations, the team determined which elements and compounds would be gaseous at these high temperatures.

“The vapor pressure of the liquid rock increases as you heat it, just as the vapor pressure of water increases as you bring a pot to boil,” Bruce Fegley, PhD, professor of earth and planetary sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, said in a prepared statement “Ultimately this puts all the constituents of the rock into the atmosphere.”

The continental crust melts at 1,720 degrees Fahrenheit, and the bulk silicate on Earth at about 3,145 degrees Fahrenheit.

According to the researchers’ calculations, the atmospheres of both model Earths would be dominated over a wide temperature range by steam and carbon dioxide.

The major difference between the models is that the BSE atmospheres is more reducing, which means it contains gases that would oxidize if oxygen were present.

Fegley told redOrbit in an email he hopes the researchers’ work has an influence on future scientific studies.
“Hopefully our work helps astronomers identify rocky extrasolar planets as they do more and more spectroscopic observations of transiting exoplanets,” he told redOrbit.

While the simulations of vaporization Earth-like planets works well for helping scientists better understand the make-up of distant exoplanets, Fegley talked about what would need to play out for the Earth to actually vaporize. He implied this scenario is not just one of fantasy, but one that is inevitable.

“The Sun is a middle aged main sequence star with about 4.5 billion years left in its life,” he told redOrbit. “At that point in the future it will balloon up in size (to beyond the orbit of Mars) and become a red giant.  At that point the Earth will be vaporized as it is swallowed up in the expanding Sun.”

Source:
Lee Rannals for redOrbit.com - Your Universe Online

Complementary Medicine & Homeopathy

Source
Complementary Medicine & Homeopathy
Aug 1, 2012 | WellBeing.com.au

Looking at different approaches to the healing process can clarify how a practitioner fits into the health care industry and how he or she relates to other health professionals.

Complementary medicine is that part of the health sector that relies primarily upon holistic, homeopathic, traditional or natural therapies rather than an allopathic approach to medicine which characterises western or orthodox medicine.

The various philosophies and approaches to treatment used in complementary medicine are hard to categorise, but a helpful starting point is to compare allopathic and homeopathic approaches. Western medicine is based on an allopathic approach to healing. The practitioner introduces into the body substances designed to correct the effect of disease or injury, and may use invasive procedures that break the skin. An allopath regards the human body as a machine made of many parts, and the doctor as an expert who ‘fixes the body’.

In contrast, a homeopath’s aim is not to counteract disease but to stimulate a healing response. Homeopathy is based on the principles of similars, that is, a homeopath introduces into the body tiny amounts of substance to produce an effect similar to the disease symptoms, aiming to stimulate the healing response.

Other modalities share an ‘holistic’ approach to healing that sees the body as a system. Rather than focusing on the disease state itself, the practitioner assess how imbalance in the body may be contributing to ill health. The task of the practitioner is to restore balance and equilibrium to the body.

WHO's Osteoporosis Myth: The Dangers of High Bone Mineral Density

WHO's Osteoporosis Myth: The Dangers of High Bone Mineral Density
Aug 3, 2012 | Sayer Ji

The present-day definitions of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis were arbitrarily conceived by the World Health Organizatoin (WHO) in the early 90's and then projected upon millions of women's bodies seemingly in order to convince them they had a drug-treatable, though symptomless, disease.

Osteopenia (1992)[i] and Osteoporosis (1994)[ii] were formally identified as skeletal diseases by the WHO as bone mineral densities (BMD) 1 and 2.5 standard deviations, respectively, below the peak bone mass of an average young adult Caucasian female, as measured by an x-ray device known as Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, or DEXA).

This technical definition, now used widely around the world as the gold standard, is disturbingly inept, and as we shall see, likely conceals an agenda that has nothing to do with the promotion of health.

Deviant Standards: Aging Transformed Into a Disease

A 'standard deviation' is simply a quantity calculated to indicate the extent of deviation for a group as a whole, i.e. within any natural population there will be folks with higher and lower biological values, e.g. height, weight, bone mineral density, cholesterol levels. The choice of an average young adult female (approximately 30-year old) at peak bone mass in the human lifecycle as the new standard of normality for all women 30 or older, was, of course, not only completely arbitrary but also highly illogical. After all, why should a 80-year old's bones be defined as "abnormal" if they are less dense than a 30-year old's?

Read more..

Changing views: Stone age man had 'feminine side'

© Unknown
Changing views: Stone age man had 'feminine side'
July 31, 2012 | Phys.org

Dr. Karina Croucher, who has studied buried remains of people living between 7,500 and 10,000 years ago across the Middle East, says the stereotypical view of how Neolithic men and women lived is wrong.

Unlike today, she argues, it was normal for men and women to show compassion for each other- and gender was not so clearly defined.

The researcher argues male bias in archaeology has distorted our understanding of how ancient peoples lived, in a new book published by Oxford University Press.

Of the 40 people buried in a "death pit" in South Eastern Turkey where she was part of an excavation team, there were equal numbers of men and women.

Her theory is also based, in part, by the find of a teenage girl's skull buried carefully by the pit, called Kim by the team.

The girl - between 15 and 17 years old - whose face has been reconstructed by Chris Rynn and Caroline Wilkinson, now at Dundee University with Stuart Campbell from The University of Manchester, was deeply cared for by the men and women who tended the site. The facial reconstruction creates an emotive picture of the girl who lived 7,500 years ago.

Kim was carefully placed next to the death pit. The pit contained the fragmented remains of around 40 people, along with animal remains, pottery, flint, obsidian, and other material culture. It also displays signs of cannibalism.

Though the finds to modern eyes are gruesome, Dr. Croucher says, they show a compassionate side to both Neolithic men and women.

She said: "In the Death Pit, a specific choice was made to inter these human remains - including Kim - within its context, and that undoubtedly required care and effort, not only in its construction, but additionally in keeping the area protected and clear of scavengers. Even the cannibalism was probably seen by these people as a compassionate act.

"When human remains from across the region are examined, it becomes apparent that it was difficult for the living to let go of their loved ones. For example, human faces were recreated onto the skulls of the dead using plaster, and they were cared for within houses.

This treatment was not dependent on age or gender, but according to relationships and emotive ties. "This and other evidence shows that it's clear the relationship between men and women during the Neolithic Period does not conform to the modern age.

"The stereotypical and inaccurate view of male hunters dominating their more submissive female counterparts is an articulation of male bias in archaeology.

"It was much less well defined than that: Men and women were treated equally in death and were shown equal compassion, and their tasks were likely to be thought of as equal during life. Our biases in the present were not relevant to our ancestors, and are not natural or inherent behaviours.

"So we should not understand the past in our own terms: it's more about their relationships with each other; materials and animals.

Dr. Croucher's book was made possible by a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Provided by University of Manchester.

The Essential Alan Watts – Remixed

The Essential Alan Watts – Remixed
July 28, 2012 | Waking Times

A beautiful and artfully assembled presentation of important wisdom from the great philosopher and entertainer Alan Watts.

Being human is such a gift and it is up to each one of us to look deep within to find our connection to all things and to find our place in the cosmos.  The revelations of Alan Watts can awaken us to the recognition of our infinite nature and to our vast potential for love and for peace.

Digital, Digestible Pills Allow Doctors to Monitor Medication Use

© naturalsociety.com
Digital, Digestible Pills Allow Doctors to Monitor Medication Use
Aug 2, 2012 | Mike Barrett

Some excitingly call it the ‘beginning of an era in digital medicine,’ while others view it as a technological movement toward absolute lunacy – despite the positive-sounding advancements. Scientists are moving to put digestible microchips inside of prescription drugs so that your doctor knows if you’re actually taking your medication or not.

Doctors Could Monitor You with Digital Pills

How exactly could these microchips track your medication consumption? The sensor, which is about the size of a grain of sand, generates a voltage in response to digestive juices. The voltage response ultimately transfers a signal to the skins surface, where a patch worn by the person then sends the information to a doctor’s phone.

Although the sensors within the microchip are the first digestible devices actually approved by the FDA, the approval is only based on studies using placebo pills that show it’s safety and efficacy. Of course, digestible microchip creator Proteus would love nothing more than to have the device approved for the massive amounts of pharmaceutical drugs given out today – many of which are taken for a lifetime.
“About half of all people don’t take medications like they’re supposed to. This device could be a solution to that problem, so that doctors can know when to rev up a patient’s medication adherence,” said Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in La Jolla,California. While Topol isn’t affiliated with Proteus Digital Health, the company that manufactures the futuristic device, he embraces what it has to offer, and says“It’s like big brother watching you take your medicine.”
Is that true? Should big brother really be ‘watching over us’ to make sure everyone takes their medication? It seems as if under the guise of helpfulness, the government simply wants to exercise more control over people’s lives. A monitoring system may help control dosage recommendations, but it will ultimately collect data to create a longer-lasting customer to big pharma and continue to feed the disease machine.
“The point is not for doctors to castigate people, but to understand how people are responding to their treatments. This way doctors can prescribe a different dose or a different medicine if they learn that it’s not being taken appropriately,”  Savage says.
Additional Sources:
Nature

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Vegetarianism, Eating Disorder - Study Reveals Worrisome Relationship Among Women

© Alamy
Vegetarianism, Eating Disorder - Study Reveals Worrisome Relationship Among Women
Aug 2, 2012 | Melissa Jeltson

"I can't eat that, sorry."

If you're a vegetarian, that's a refrain you're probably familiar with. Food abounds -- at work, at social gatherings -- but you don't partake because of your dietary restrictions. That mystery hors d'oeuvre or greasy teriyaki stick? Thanks but no thanks.

There are many valid reasons to be a vegetarian (see: the environment, your health, and the dismal state of the meat industry, for starters). But what if you go vegetarian to help disguise and aid an eating disorder?

New research suggests a large percentage of women with eating disorders may be doing just that.

Women suffering from eating disorders are four times more likely to be vegetarian than women without eating disorders, according to a recent study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

The researchers found that 52 percent of women with a history of eating disorders had been vegetarians at some point in their lives. In contrast, only 12 percent of women without eating disorders had experimented with a vegetarian diet.

For clinicians who work with eating disorder patients, the results of the study were not surprising.

"Going vegetarian can be another way to cut out a food category, or a number of food categories, if you become a vegan," Vanessa Kane-Alves, a registered dietician with Boston Children's Hospital's Eating Disorders Program, told The Huffington Post. "It makes it easier when people ask you questions about where those foods have gone. It's a more socially aceptable way to restrict foods."

Especially as a teen, parents might be less apt to argue with you for not eating, she added.

Kane-Alves, who was not involved in the study, emphasized that the research doesn't argue vegetarianism causes eating disorders, or is unhealthy. Instead, it suggests vegetarianism can be a symptom of an eating disorder for some women.

"The takeaway of this study is, as a clinician, if you have a patient who tells you they want to be a vegetarian, it's worth exploring that more than you would have otherwise," she said. She suggests doctors ask their patients why they want to go vegetarian.

In the study, the motivation to go vegetarian was starkly different between women with eating disorders and those who were not. None of the women without eating disorders reported becoming vegetarians to lose weight. In contrast, almost half of those with an eating disorder history said weight was their primary motivator.

Of the women with a history of eating disorders and a history of vegetarianism, 68 percent said there was a relationship between the two. A vegetarian diet helped them lose weight, cut calories and feel in control, they reported.

Going vegetarian in order to lose weight and control eating can also fall into the category of orthorexia -- an obsession with healthy eating that can cover for an eating disorder, according to Kane-Alves.

"It's one and the same," she said. "It's all restricting food groups, spending a lot of time in your life thinking about food, preparing food, reading labels, when you don't necessarily have to."

She pointed out, too, that only five percent of those fully recovered from their eating disorder were still vegetarians.

"We always try to respect vegarian eating practices, but what this suggests is that maybe we should have different recommendations for vegetarians with eating disorders who are trying to get better," she said. "We need to at least have a discussion with the person about how it might be getting in the way of their recovery."

Consuming Large Amounts of This Mineral Reduces Cancer Risk By 67 Percent

© preventdisease.com
Consuming Large Amounts of This Mineral Reduces Cancer Risk By 67 Percent
Aug 1, 2012 | Peta Bee

Who would have thought that the earth beneath our feet could be to blame for health woes ranging from heart disease to thyroid problems to cancer? Yet that’s the view of some experts who say levels of selenium, a mineral essential for good health, are so low in soil in Europe that it’s affecting the food chain, diets and, ultimately, the risk of disease.

The body uses selenium to make ‘selenoproteins’, which work like antioxidants preventing damage to cells.
There is a growing body of evidence to show it has a key role in health.

Just last week, researchers at the University of East Anglia found people who eat large amounts of the mineral, along with vitamins C and E, are 67 percent less likely to develop pancreatic cancer.

Previous research has shown that in old age a good selenium intake helps enhance brain function, so that cognition remains sharp and active.

The problem is we are not getting enough.

The richest food sources of selenium are Brazil nuts, kidney, liver and fish, but the foods that make the largest contribution to our selenium intake -- because we eat proportionately more of them -- are cereals, bread, meat and poultry.

However, because levels of selenium in our soil are low, cattle aren’t absorbing as much when they graze, nor are crops or other fresh produce grown on it.

As a result, there is less selenium available from meat, grains and vegetables.

Farming methods have a part to play. In a study conducted at Warwick University’s Horticultural Research Institute a few years ago, it was found that although British and northern European soils have been relatively low in selenium since the last ice age, levels are being further depleted by intensive modern farming methods and the use of chemical fertilisers.

‘Selenium levels in our blood plummeted after the time the government began measuring them in 1974,’ says Margaret Rayman, professor of nutritional medicine at the University of Surrey and a leading researcher in selenium’s effects.

‘They stabilised at this sub-optimal level in the mid-Nineties as our diets haven’t changed much since.’

She adds: ‘If you live in the UK, the likelihood is you are not grossly deficient, but do have low levels of selenium.’

The problem is compounded by the fact that we import less wheat from America’s selenium-rich soils than ever before, she says.

Soil in the U.S. has higher levels of selenium due both to different geological conditions and the fact that it’s generally more alkaline, allowing better uptake of nutrients by plants.

In fact, the average Briton consumes only half (30-35 mcg) of the daily amount recommended by the government (60 mcg for women, 75 mcg for men).

In the long-term, the effects of low intakes can be devastating, says Professor Rayman.

Earlier this year, in a paper published in The Lancet, she detailed selenium’s links to everything from enhanced fertility and thyroid function to preventing plaque build-up in the arteries and regulating blood pressure.

One study of men with fertility problems showed that 100 mcg selenium supplements taken daily significantly increased sperm cells’ ability to swim, indicating they had been selenium-deficient.

Eleven percent of men who took the supplement went on to father a child.

‘Selenium is an essential component of two selenoproteins required for healthy sperm,’ says Professor Rayman.

‘One of these is needed for transportation of selenium into the testes and the other gives sperm a stable structure that allows it to swim.’

But selenium is not without controversy.

Lately, some of the scientists who once hailed it as a small medical breakthrough for serious diseases have backtracked, suggesting their latest findings appear to show its power may have been overstated.

Selenium was, for instance, thought to be able to fight prostate cancer and heart disease, but various studies in the past five years have chipped away at the notions.

One large study in the American Journal of Epidemiology followed more than 1,000 adults for seven-and-a-half years and found those who took 200 mcg of selenium daily had no reduction in their risk of developing heart disease or of dying from it than those who took a placebo.

Indeed, eating large quantities of Brazil nuts was found in one study at the University of Warwick to raise cholesterol levels by 10 percent and raise the risk of heart disease, not lower it.

And while some scientists have recently shown it protects against bladder cancer in women, others have found it does nothing to help to prevent lung cancer.

Similar conflicting evidence surrounds selenium’s role in the prevention of type 2 diabetes, with some studies suggesting high selenium levels lower the prevalence of the condition by helping to control glucose metabolism.

However, other studies, including research by Saverio Stranges, professor of cardiovascular epidemiology at Warwick University, have found no such benefit and, indeed, that it ‘may increase the risk for the disease’.
So what are we to believe?

Of the negative studies, some -- including those on prostate cancer -- were conducted on people with already raised levels of selenium who were in no danger of deficiency, Professor Rayman says. In other words, it’s no surprise that giving them a supplement would have no real benefit.

‘If your selenium status is low to start with, then you will almost certainly benefit from increasing your intake,’ she says.

‘But if you already have high blood levels of the mineral, you won’t benefit from taking more and it could be dangerous.’

Professor Rayman, in her Lancet review, concluded that adding selenium to the diet -- either through eating selenium-rich foods or through supplementation -- is beneficial only if you really need it.

So, how do you know if your selenium levels are low and what should you do about it?

Professor Rayman says: ‘Unless you eat either white or oily fish or offal several times a week, the likelihood is that living in the UK means you aren’t getting enough.’

The best way to boost your intake is eating more fish and other selenium-rich food, but it may also be beneficial to take a supplement.

There is growing debate about whether anyone needs to take single nutrient supplements because of risks of disease -- but when it comes to selenium, even sceptics think it’s worth taking.

After analysing studies for their book The Health Delusion, Aidan Goggins, a pharmacist, and Glen Matten, both of whom have masters degrees in nutritional medicine, found the only antioxidant supplement that appeared to offer protection against cancer was selenium.

However, Professor Rayman warns people should be ‘extremely careful’ about increasing their intake of selenium because too much of it can be dangerous.

More than 0.45 mg a day can trigger a condition called selenosis, which can cause brittle nails and hair, skin lesions and a garlic-like odour on the breath, adds Claire Williamson, a nutrition scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation.

Professor Rayman takes a 65 mcg daily supplement and advises popping a pill containing no more than 100 mcg a day of selenium for men and 50-65 mcg for women if your diet contains few selenium-rich foods.

As selenium tablets often come in much larger doses, you may have to break a tablet in half.

Professor Rayman warns not to gorge on Brazil nuts. ‘They contain a heavy metal substance called barium in levels that can become toxic, causing nausea and more serious side-effects if you eat them regularly.

‘It’s irresponsible of nutritionists to suggest people should eat Brazil nuts by the handful for this reason.’ No more than two or three nuts a day is recommended.

Professor Rayman adds: ‘Selenium has many benefits and your body needs to have enough. But more is definitely not better in this case.’

The Truth About Disease - What it is and What Causes it

© Unknown
The Truth About Disease - What it is and What Causes it
Aug 2, 2012 | Capt. Randall

Does the common use of the word "disease" bypass critical reasoning to effectively mislead scientific thought? Modern medicine describes hundreds of individual "diseases." Each "disease" is generally named for a group of symptoms and the area of the body affected. Many are suffixed by -itis, meaning inflammation of... like tonsill-itis or arthr-itis. And interestingly, recent studies are finding inflammation involved in virtually all of them. Does this terminology serve to pigeonhole distinct "diseases" and distract us from seeing the big picture of inflammation as the disease? Have we been looking at secondary pathologies and opportunistic microbes, and treating them at symptom-level... instead of addressing a common root cause? Is there some imaginary partition that separates human health from chemistry, physics and cell biology?

Whether inflammation is acute like appendicitis or chronic like atherosclerosis and obesity, an immune response is taking place. In-flam-mation literally means "on fire" and is classically marked by the Latin: rubor, tumor, calor and dolor - or redness, swelling, heat and pain - so we know from those words that oxidation is at work.

Oxidation is simply fire or rust or whenever one molecule seizes an electron from another molecule. The needy oxidant grabs or shares the electrons of an electron rich anti-oxidant. When the electrons are stolen from chemical bonds, those molecules (like DNA) come apart or are deformed (like fats) and said to be oxidized, burnt.

Inflammation does not just happen; a bacterium or toxin or some other irritant triggers an immune response. The ammunition used by the body for immune firefights is singlet oxygen, an all-purpose defensive weapon. With an unpaired electron, an oxygen radical is a powerful oxidant.

It can deconstruct and destroy pathogens, poisons, cell debris and other unwanted substances, molecule by molecule, by snatching the electrons that hold them together. Immune cells initiate the conflagration, armed with mini-flamethrowers that generate oxidative bursts of singlet oxygen to burn the area clean.

Mounting an oxidative immune response is dependent on the strength of the body's electrochemical charge, which in turn hinges on a delicate balance between oxidants/acids (both electron-hungry) and overall body charge. (This charge is generated in mitochondria and at fluid/membrane interfaces. It is stored in fatty membranes, "anti-oxidant" molecules and water, and even flows from the Earth itself. Charge is transmitted via nerves and connective tissue meridians. If a potato can generate electricity, so can your body!) In the end, it is the electrochemical charge terrain that determines biochemical reactions, molecular integrity and health.

An oxidative immune response must be powered with, and yet contained by, abundant electrons, or damage will result to the cells it is designed to protect. To halt inflammation, the cause of the immune response needs to be removed, and then the flames of the defensive assault itself must be extinguished so charge can rise to normal and cells can be repaired or replaced.

So if we equate disease to inflammation, and understand that inflammation is oxidation, then we can understand that the common denominator of "disease" is oxidative stress - chronic unrelenting "fire" - loss of electrons, DNA dysfunction, and molecular and cellular deterioration.

Nearly undetectable low-level oxidative stress takes place even in healthy individuals and has become a focus of longevity research. Some of the most promising studies are concerned with the integrity of telomeres and mitochondrial membranes that take a beating, being at the center of metabolic oxidation and electron energy production. Fatty cell and mitochondrial membranes are prone to destruction when improper fats are consumed - making an All-American low-fat, high-glycemic, high-grain-carb/sugar/vegetable oil diet a train-wreck in progress.

Impaired membranes cannot transport oxygen or other substances to the cell, nor can they hold electron charge. These conditions bring disease, invite pathogens, cause cells to revert to cancerous anaerobic state, and eventually lead to cell death by suffocation. Undamaged Omega fats and varied saturated fats like butter and coconut oil are essential; crooked hydrogenated/oxidized/trans-fats/easily-oxidized polyunsaturated oils and a grain-based diet kill.

So are there individual "diseases" or just varied symptoms of inflammation expressing at the weakest seams in the boat - the points of nutritional inadequacy, sites of infection, trauma or toxic metal concentration or areas of circulatory stagnation, low charge and poor oxygenation? It all depends on how you look at it - on what level causes are sought.

We need oxygen to produce energy (electrons) and we need (electron) energy to deliver oxygen to mitochondria as a basic necessity of life. When net electron charge falls below optimum levels, oxygen/energy needs are unmet, inner balances shift toward acidity, hypoxia, oxidative stress, inflammation - and there is your disease.

What to do? Examine the three major areas of concern: nutrition, toxins/radiations and emotional states/lifestyle choices.

Nutrition can easily be divided into acid-forming and alkalizing food groups. A healthy balance favors alkalinity since acids rob electrons and charge. Processing strips electrons from foods. Fats are critical to membrane construction, should be consumed in pristine un-oxidized form and should be protected by fat-soluble antioxidants like Vitamins A, D, E and K and astaxanthin. Nutrition includes pH buffering electrolyte minerals like potassium and magnesium, and enzyme/hormone essentials like zinc, selenium and iodine, all of which are egregiously deficient across the population.

Nutrition also feeds gut bacteria and determines populations. These symbiants are there for our benefit and deserve respect.

Nutrients can be rated on the ORAC scale (oxygen radical absorbance capacity), so high ORAC means high electron content, antioxidant power. Look at cayenne and oregano, and small red beans and pecans, and direct your choices accordingly.

Nutrition is like the list of parts for a car: you need them all, and then to make it all work, the battery must have strong voltage. To make your biochemistry and DNA work, you need volts, too!

Toxins, metals and radiation all have one thing in common: they steal charge by generating oxidizing free radicals. They also trigger an immune response that brings inflammation. Detox! Organic toxins can be destroyed by oxidation. Pathogen attractive positively-charged metals can be reduced, mobilized and excreted by raising charge, supplementing proteolytic enzymes and supplying chelators like chlorella. Radiation damage can be prevented or ameliorated with antioxidant electrons that scrub free radicals formed of damaged cell molecules.

The mind is like the computer in the car. It monitors and adjusts internal conditions while the conscious part in the driver's seat sets the tone of being. When the mood is chronically fearful, internal conditions deteriorate. When spirits are sunny and loving, your cells sing and your lifestyle choices become proactive - especially with healthy meals, exercise, breathing and physical activity at beneficial levels.

Check previous articles like "Healer's Toolbox" for some of the substances that work if employed correctly and quantitatively, giving this approach a practical validity and logic. To reverse disease, the sources of inflammation must be oxidized/burned/removed and then the flames of inflammation snuffed out by an overwhelming electron boost to restore charge/voltage to operational levels and obtain sufficient oxygen to generate more charge and reverse damage. Hundreds of specific vitamins, minerals, phytonutrients, enzymes, amino acids and fats have proven useful in studies covering a wide range of maladies ultimately boosting body voltage and returning internal conditions to viable parameters.

Perhaps we should reevaluate the words at the foundation of health science. What if "diseases" are just symptoms? What if disease is simply inflammation, weak voltage----oxidative stress? Maybe an artful and quantitative application of these forbidden principles should be at the foundation of healing.

Capt. Randall is the author of Forbidden Healing and an independent health researcher. He studied chemistry and biology at the University of Florida. His interests range from marine science to archaeology and ethnobotany.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

URGENT MESSAGES from Crop Circles about 2012 /2013 - RED GIANT PHASE P1/2

URGENT MESSAGES from Crop Circles about 2012 /2013 - RED GIANT PHASE P1/2 
Aug 1, 2012 |



Comment: When someone mentions vegan remember the Avatar and what is really occurring. Eventually they get tired of using it.

Does Conventional Medical Training Destroy Empathy?

© greenmedinfo.com
Does Conventional Medical Training Destroy Empathy?
July 31, 2012 | Sayer Ji

A surprisingly consistent body of research exists indicating that conventional medical training actually reduces practitioner empathy. What is worse, the decline in empathy appears even more pronounced at the time that the curriculum shifts towards patient-care activities.

In one study published in 2009 in the journal Academic Medicine entitled "The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school," the authors conclude:
It is ironic that the erosion of empathy occurs during a time when the curriculum is shifting toward patient-care activities; this is when empathy is most essential."
In another, higher-powered systematic review published in the same journal last year entitled "Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents," researchers looked at data from 1990-2010, which included 18 studies, and found:
The five longitudinal and two cross-sectional studies of residents showed a decrease in empathy during residency. The studies pointed to the clinical practice phase of training and the distress produced by aspects of the "hidden," "formal," and "informal" curricula as main reasons for empathy decline."

They Concluded

The results of the reviewed studies, especially those with longitudinal data, suggest that empathy decline during medical school and residency compromises striving toward professionalism and may threaten health care quality."
While the ironic decline of empathy associated with clinical practice during medical training is cause for concern, what may be even more disturbing is that the decline in empathy persists after training has ended.

In a 2005 study published in Academic Medicine and entitled "Mood change and empathy decline persist during three years of internal medicine training," researchers noted that some of the mood disturbances and declines in empathy associated with residency/internship "never fully recover," indicating that conventional medical training may produce real, diagnosable psychological traumas that may never be fully resolved and may adversely affect the quality of healthcare provided.

Empathy, after all, has concrete and measurable therapeutic effects in others. In 2009, researchers found that practitioner empathy reduced the duration of the common cold in their patients. Conversely, a negative and/or indifferent attitude towards the patient has measurable adverse effects, also known as the nocebo effect.  Indeed, our recent article titled, "Research: Some Cancer Diagnoses Kill You Quicker Than the Cancer," discusses the finding that the risk of suicide is12 times higher and the risk of heart-related death 6 times higher during the first week following a cancer diagnosis versus those who were diagnosed cancer free.

Sayer Ji is the founder and chair of GreenMedInfo.com. His writings have been published in the Wellbeing Journal, the Journal of Gluten Sensitivity, and have been featured on numerous websites, including Mercola.com, NaturalNews.com, Infowars.com, Care2.com. His critically acclaimed essay series The Dark Side of Wheat opens up a new perspective on the universal, human-species specific toxicity of wheat, and is now available for PDF download.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst

© unknown
The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst
Aug 1, 2012 | Paul Craig Roberts

The State Department has an office that hunts German war criminals. Bureaucracies being what they are, the office will exist into next century when any surviving German prison guards will be 200 years old. From time to time the State Department claims to have found a lowly German soldier who was assigned as a prison camp guard. The ancient personage, who had lived in the US for the past 50 or 60 years without doing harm to anyone, is then merciless persecuted, usually on the basis of hearsay. I have never understood what the State Department thinks the alleged prison guard was supposed to have done–freed the prisoners, resign his position?–when Prussian aristocrats, high-ranking German Army generals and Field Marshall and national hero Erwin Rommel were murdered for trying to overthrow Hitler.

What the State Department needs is an office that rounds up American war criminals.

They are in abundance and not hard to find. Indeed, recently 56 of them made themselves public by signing a letter to President Obama demanding that he send in the US Army to complete the destruction of Syria and its people that Washington has begun.

At the Nuremberg Trials of the defeated Germans after World War II, the US government established the principle that naked aggression–the American way in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, and Yemen–is a war crime. Therefore, there is a very strong precedent for the State Department to round up those neoconservatives who are fomenting more war crimes.

But don’t expect it to happen. Today, war criminals run the State Department and the entire US Government. They are elected to the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and appointed to the federal courts as judges. American soldiers, such as Bradley Manning, who behave as the State Department expects German soldiers to have behaved, are not honored, but are thrown into dungeons and tortured while a court marshall case is concocted against them.

Hypocrisy is Washington’s hallmark, and all but the most delusional are now accustomed to their rulers speaking one way and behaving in the opposite. It is now part of the American character to regard ourselves as members of the “virtuous nation,” “the indispensable people,” while our rulers commit war crimes around the globe.

Whereas we have all been made complicit in war crimes by “our” government, it still behooves us to know who are the active war criminals in our midst who have burdened us with our war criminal reputation.

You can learn the identity of many of those who are driving the world into World War Three, while their policies result in the murder of large numbers of Arabs and Muslims in Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, and Lebanon, by perusing the signatures to the contrived letter to Obama from the neoconsevatives calling on Obama to invade Syria in order to “rescue” the Syrian people from their government.

According the the letter signed by 56 neoconservatives, only the Syrian government is responsible for deaths in Syria. The Washington sponsored and armed “rebels” are merely protecting the Syrian people from the Assad government. According to the letter signers, the only way the Syrian people can be saved is if Washington overthrows the Syrian government and installs a puppet state attentive to the needs of Israel and Washington.

Among the 56 signatures are a few names from the Syrian National Congress, believed to be a CIA front, and a few names from dupes among the goyim. The rest of the signatures are those of Jewish neoconservatives tightly allied with Israel, some of whom are apparently dual-Israeli citizens who participate in the formation of US foreign policy. The names on this list comprise a concentration of evil, the goal of which is not only to bring armageddon to the Syrian people but also to the world.

The letter to Obama is part of the propaganda operation to demonize the Syrian government with lies in order to get rid of a government that supports Hizbollah, the Muslims in southern Lebanon who have twice driven the vaunted, but cowardly, Israeli army out of Lebanon, thus preventing the Israeli government from achieving its aim of stealing the water resources of southern Lebanon.

Not a single sentence in the letter is correct. Listen to this one for example: “The Assad regime poses a grave threat to national security interests of the United States.” What utter total absurdity, and the morons who signed the letter pretend to be “security experts.”

How do we evaluate the fact that 56 people have no shame whatsoever and will lie to the President of the United States, telling him to his face the most absurd and obvious false things in order to advance their personal agenda at the expense of not merely the lives of Syrians but, by leading to wider war, of life on earth?

This same neocon architects of armageddon are also working against Iran, Russia, the former Soviet central Asian countries, Ukraine, Belarus, and China. It seems that they can’t wait to start a nuclear war.

You can find the names of some of humanity’s worst enemies here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32021.htm

Irrefutable Scientific Evidence That We Are All One

Source
Irrefutable Scientific Evidence That We Are All One
Aug 1, 2012 | Christina Sarich

If a system does not interact with its environment in any way. . . it does not exist in nature.

I will start this article with the definition of an isolated system: implies a system that does not interact with the other systems of its environment in any way. Now I ask: Does an isolated system exist?

An isolated system is based on something that is not fund in nature. Curious. Heretofore – all scientific exploration has looked at things as isolated systems. For example, we try to separate something and look at it as small, separate parts. . .the cell, the nervous system, the elements of the periodic table, apples, flowers, tables, etc. but this does not exist in nature – not in any system, not in gravitational pull, not in biological functions, not in mechanical engineering, not in sociological systems, etc. In Tibetan Buddhist teachings this is referred to dependent arising or pratityasamutpada. It is the notion that things only exist as referential systems to cause and effect by other things. Or, nothing exists in a closed-system. The Huayan-Zong school established during the Tang dynasty teaches this point as a primary focus of its spiritual theory. The Upanishads and Vedasspoke of this repeatedly. There are countless other traditions throughout India, Japan, Asia, Korea, China, Australia, Africa, and elsewhere which tell the same story.

I will use geometry to explain this point.  Take any shape, for now, we will look at a circle – is this an isolated system? It divides space between inside and outside. In fact, each circle is only another point of information, or energy. Within a circle, there can be smaller circles, and so on – infinitely. So again, it is not an isolated system, because the ‘space’ can always be divided into smaller diameters, or larger diameters, so the outline of the circle is just a temporary description of energy or information. This is essentially what fractals are – an infinite description of information into smaller and smaller, recurring shapes or definitions of space. But these definitions can be redefined infinitely. There are no isolated systems. This is the premise of holographic physics. All information is present in each part because it is referential to all other parts of the ‘system.’ The system, therefore, is not closed, but infinite.

Source

People are similar. We use our outlines, just like the diameter of a circle to define ourselves, and act as if we are an isolated system, but we are not. We say we don’t have enough food, money, time, energy, etc. but this is pure fallacy, scientifically. If we are infinite, then so are our resources. Our energy is infinite. Our information is infinite. The finite self is an illusion – not just in esoteric or spiritual terms, but in scientific ones.
Space is everywhere – between galaxies, stars, quasars, planets, atoms, in the densest material, there is still space. Buckminster Fuller said, “Nothing touches.” That is how much space there is. Even an atom is made of 99.99999% space. It is the .00001% that we call the ‘real world.’ We call this isolated system reality. We ignore the truth on a daily basis. Matter doesn’t define space. Matter is defined by the space.

The unified field theory, as first proposed by Einstein when he attempted to correct our concepts of a closed system by merging the general theory of relativity and our understanding of electromagnetism, or electromagnetic interaction, the heretofore unknown organizing substance that holds together quarks to form neutrons, protons, and the nuclei of atoms, short range electroactivity, and gravitational interaction on all particles is still a theory because scientists do not understand what organizing substance or principal allows the continuous interaction of all systems. In fact, in most modern physics, gravity is the hardest force to include in the unified field theory because general relativity and quantum mechanics seem to be at odds with each other.

It is in fact, the supposition that these ‘closed systems’ react independently of one another that forms the final conundrum. A TOE or theory of everything has to pull together all known forms of physical matter – to explain what spiritual folks have been asserting – that we are all one. Archimedes and Einstein have attempted the TOE as have surfing scientists in Hawaii and numerous well-credentialed professors at Universities the world over. Plato and Socrates wanted an answer to our unity, as did Galileo.

If one were to read the paṭicca-samuppāda, an important Pali text, one can decide that everything exists or that nothing exists, polar opposites to the truth of the matter – that in relation to one another, there is a middle way. (Yes, the famous middle way that the Buddha spoke of) which ties all phenomenon – physical, mental and otherwise – together. In fact the word loka, which is often translated to mean ‘world’ really means ‘an open place or an open space.’

Space Makes Up 99.99999% of All Things

If we are truly 99.99999% space and the world, or loka is an open space or place, then how are we limited, or a closed system at all? We are an open-system, integrally related, dependent on one another for existence and actuality. Physicists may not yet have nailed down the TOE but there is irrefutable scientific evidence that cannot be ignored. We are all one morethan metaphorically, in a lets-all-hold-hands-and-sing-kumbaya way – but physically, mentally and relationally.

Sources:
Nassim Haramein – The Energy of the Future - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc4pi1PXb38&feature=related

Is Paṭicca-samuppada a Theory of Everything? Jayarava Nov 2010.1
Ronkin,Noa. 2005. Early Buddhist Metaphysics: the Making of a Philosophical Tradition. London, Routledge Curzon.

About the Author

Christina Sarich is a musician, yogi, humanitarian and freelance writer who channels many hours of studying Lao Tzu, Paramahansa Yogananda, Rob Brezny,  Miles Davis, and Tom Robbins into interesting tidbits to help you Wake up Your Sleepy Little Head, and See the Big Picture. Her blog is Yoga For the New World.