Ketogenic diets are powerful tools, and they can be life changing.
Shifting to a low carb, fat burning diet can help you reduce your high
blood pressure, banish heartburn, get rid of joint pain, and stop
pre-diabetes in its tracks.
I used to have all those health conditions and worse, and I've reversed them all. You can too.
On this website,
you'll find information on how these diets work, the right way to "do"
the diet, and the details on how you can increase your energy and
improve your health simply by changing the way you eat.
What is a ketogenic diet?
Contrary to popular rhetoric, a ketogenic, low carb diet is NOT a high
protein diet. It's a high fat diet, with a moderate protein and a very
low carbohydrate intake. A typical ketogenic meal looks like the picture
above.
When you reduce the amount of carbohydrate and increase the fat and
protein in your diet, it has the effect of switching your body into fat
burning mode.
Instead of using the easily exhausted sugar from carbohydrates for fuel,
your body burns stored fat for energy, and it's this fat burning
process which greatly improves health and well-being.
In fact, a ketogenic, high fat, moderate protein diet can alleviate many serious health issues.
Some medical researchers and physicians are using ketogenic, carb restricted diets to:
Improve epilepsy treatment outcomes by reducing, and in some cases, eliminating seizures.
Help patients with Alzheimers disease regain memory and thought function.
Give diabetics control over their blood sugar with more effective diabetes treatment plans.
Eliminate gluten allergy symptoms and relieve the symptoms of other allergic conditions associated with autoimmune reactions.
And many people, including myself, have discovered that a ketogenic
diet is a very effective tool for regaining health, losing excess weight
and building a muscular, healthy body.
What makes the ketogenic diet so effective?
It all starts with a process called ketosis,
and the effect that it has on each one of the trillions of cells in our
bodies. In short, ketosis means more energy and cleaner fuel burning in
our cells, which leads to better cell health, better organ health, and
better health overall.
But isn't a high fat diet unhealthy?
Actually, a high fat diet is healthier for you, when it is eaten while carbohydrate consumption is kept low.
A diet high in clean saturated fats and low in carbohydrates actually
raises your HDL good cholesterol and lowers your triglycerides. These
two factors are really the true measure of good heart health.
More and more people are discovering the benefits of eating more fat, and reducing carbohydrate consumption.
Literally thousands of people have gone on the Atkins diet, or the
Protein Power diet, or some other higher fat, low carb diet and reaped
the benefits. They have resolved nagging health issues (high blood
sugar, hypertension, heartburn, joint pain, etc.), reversed serious
disease processes, lost weight, felt better, and rarely felt hunger.
Farmers, Others Criminalized for Feeding Communities
Two groups of activists known as the Raw Milk Freedom Riders and
Lemonade Freedom Day, are taking their raw milk and lemonade to the lawn
of the US Capitol to celebrate what they call their right to “voluntary
exchange.”
Recent shut downs of children’s lemonade stands and SWAT-style raids on
small farmers have inspired these mothers and other activists to take
their message to the Capitol where they plan to risk criminal charges,
and possibly jail, by gathering for a picnic with these illicit foods.
Media are invited to witness the peaceful exchange. More details below. . . .
When: Saturday, August 18, 2012 12:00 noon
Where: Lawn of the Capitol Reflecting Pool, Washington DC.
Who: Robert Fernandes, Founder Lemonade Freedom Day, Liz Reitzig,
co-founder Farm Food Freedom Coalition and Eddie Free, National
Individual Rights Activist.
Other Speakers include:
Max Kane, Currently fighting state of Wisconsin for the right to private contract.
Derrick J, National Freedom Activist recently jailed for his peaceful activism.
John Moody, Successfully challenged the state of Kentucky over private buying club rights.
Kristin Canty, Producer, Farmageddon, the movie.
Kathryn Dill, Liberty Activist.
Visuals: Crowds with signs, Capitol building, Families with
small children, Children with lemonade stands, Mothers distributing
milk, Law enforcement
Background: National Lemonade Freedom day founder, and one of
the main organizers of the August event, Robert Fernandes, began the
tradition after seeing multiple news reports about children’s lemonade
stands being shut down because they did not comply with regulations.
The FDA has engaged in several long undercover sting operations and
raids against peaceful farmers and buying clubs over raw milk. FDA is
also pressuring states to restrict raw dairy access.
These activists believe that people have the right to engage in
voluntary exchange and peacefully obtain the food of their choice from
the producer of their choice whether that’s raw milk from a local farmer
or lemonade from the children next door.
Scientists say the panoramic images are crucial for understanding the
landscape of the Red Planet. The planet's brownish-red surface is
desolate and pebbly. The mountainous rim of the crater in which the
rover landed is off in the distance. They have not anounced any great
discoveries; they are simply making sure everything works. The Mars
Reconnaissance orbiter captured a space view of where the rover its
parachute and parts came to rest. The rover's 17 cameras have sent back
pictures of the heat shield separating. Al Jazeera's Brian Rooney
reports from Pasadena, California.
(OMNS Aug 8, 2012) If
you are wondering whether a discussion of GMOs is a fitting subject for
this newsletter, consider that Linus Pauling defined "orthomolecular" as
"the right molecule." Genetically modified food may be an example of
wholesale ingestion of wrong molecules. Howard Straus, who you may
remember from a previous politically incorrect OMNS release (http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v08n18.shtml),
returns to offer an opinion not necessarily shared by individual OMNS
editors. However, it is sure to either astonish or annoy, maybe both. -
Andrew W. Saul, Editor
Controversy over Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) has been increasing in intensity. Cases in point:
Depending on which poll, and how the
question is asked, between 75% and 95% of Americans believe that foods
containing GMOs ought to be labeled or identified, so they have a choice
about consuming them or feeding them to their children. They are
opposed by giant agribusiness corporations in league with captive
government regulatory agencies, who maintain, with no evidence
whatsoever to support them, that GMO foods are safe for human
consumption.
Monsanto illegally tested GMO
cotton in India, endangering the rest of the Indian cotton crop by not
troubling themselves to take any containment precautions to prevent
accidental spread of the plants to non-test fields. When farmers found
out about the illegal fields, they uprooted and burned all the plants in
the fields. (http://www.greens.org/s-r/19/19-19.html)
The government of France fined
Monsanto tens of thousands of euros for lying about the safety of its
best-selling herbicide, Round-Up. (http://www.terradaily.com/2006/070126154451.ovopjxml.html)
After appeals reaching the French Supreme Court, all of which Monsanto
lost, they were left without further places to appeal. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027352_Monsanto_GMO_Roundup.html)
Monsanto's GMO seeds are often sold in conjunction with Round-Up on the
premise that weeds cannot survive high doses of the herbicide, while
the GMO crop plants can.
In many European countries,
consumers given the choice of purchasing foods with or without GMOs, as
evidenced by mandatory labeling, avoid these so-called "Frankenfoods" by
the millions. Americans can't. When is the last time you saw the words
"Contains genetically modified ingredients" on a food label?
The biotech industry's history of
mendaciousness regarding GMO plants extends all the way back to the
first test plots of GMO crops. We were assured (apparently without any
basis in fact) there was no chance whatever of the genes spreading to
other plants or weeds. As has been the case ever since, these bland and
unverified assurances turned out to be either wishful thinking or a
willful lies, unsupported by any testing. Within three years, the weeds
surrounding the GMO crop fields showed the same genetic modification
and resistance to pesticide as the GMO crops. By this time, though, the
genie was already out of the bottle.
Food Industry Power Politics
While touting organic food, and planting
an organic garden on the White House grounds, President Obama's
administration has turned over US agriculture lock, stock and barrel, to
Monsanto, appointing Monsanto rooter and former governor of Iowa Tom
Vilsack to the post of Secretary of Agriculture, and former Monsanto
Vice President for Public Policy and lobbyist Michael Taylor the office
of Deputy Commissioner for Foods, the number two position in the USDA
(US Department of Agriculture). Several GMO crops were promptly
approved by the USDA for agriculture. Tom Vilsack flew around the
campaign trail on private jets provided by Monsanto (http://www.greenchipstocks.com/articles/usda-backs-monsanto-caves-under-white-house-pressure/1236).
The "big six" manufacturers of
genetically modified seeds, have used their seemingly limitless funds to
force GMO agriculture on the entire US and are on track to extend its
forcible conversion of the world's crops to all other countries. They
have used their economic and marketplace power, along with massive
government influence, to crush farmers and organizations who refuse to
use GMO seeds. They continue their goal of a complete takeover of
American food agriculture by gradually purchasing the seed companies
that would otherwise provide an alternative seed source for farmers
averse to GMO crops.
Foxes in the FDA Henhouse
The biotech industry has often made
representations about GMO products that have proven false in the long
run, proving that they either have not tested their product properly or
are lying about the results. This is highly disturbing, given that one
of the representations they have made is that GMO crops are safe for
human and animal consumption. The FDA has relied totally on these
representations to approve the crops for use in agriculture and food
production, yet no independent testing of the crops has ever been done.
Monsanto claims that their crops are "substantially identical" to the
unmodified crops when pressed for safety testing, yet claim that the
crops are different enough from natural crops to warrant patent
protection. At very least, one of these two assertions must be false.
When asked about whether their GMO crops
were safe, Monsanto's Director of Public Communications went on record
saying, "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech
food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its
safety is the F.D.A.'s job" (Philip Angell, Monsanto's director of
corporate communications. "Playing God in the Garden" New York Times Magazine, Oct 25, 1998.)
For its part, the FDA seems to have
abdicated its position as guarantor of food safety, too. "Ultimately,
it is the food producer who is responsible for assuring safety" (FDA,
"Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties" [GMO
Policy], Federal Register, Vol. 57, No. 104, 1992, p. 229.)
Do the words "catch" and "twenty-two" come to mind?
Unnatural, Unsafe and Unscientific
Any experienced farmer will confirm the
dangers of monoculture. Strains of crops that produce well during wet
seasons may fail during unusually dry seasons. Strains that are
resistant to one variety of pest may be highly sensitive to a
newly-introduced exotic pest. Monoculture, or depending for all your
sustenance on one strain of a food plant, is tantamount to food suicide,
as some weakness, either to stress, pests or even some dead-end on a
multi-generational reproductive series could prove. If the one strain
that we have fails to be viable in the long run, we risk massive famine
and all its attendant ills. Yet, with the collusion of the US
government, this is the scheme that the biotech industry is forcing on
American agriculture, and, if they have their way, on the entire world.
We believe that we should have some say in the matter of whether we
risk mass starvation because of a reckless, power and money grab by the
biotech industry. Our corrupt congress and regulatory agencies disagree.
What, We Worry?
One of the common defenses put forth by
producers of deadly substances, whether they be vaccines,
pharmaceuticals or GMOs, is, "There is no evidence showing that XYZ is
harmful to human health." Such a claim would be akin to a mass murderer
claiming that since nobody actually caught him killing anyone, he should
be deemed innocent, and the police believing him! I submit that this
standard of innocence is not good enough when promoting a product (GMOs
or vaccines) or technology (nuclear power generation) that has the
potential to eliminate life on this planet. Instead, there should,
must, in fact be strong and incontrovertible evidence that XYZ is safe
for human life, and that it accomplishes the task it is intended to
perform, with strong and independent oversight enforcing safe operation
or provision. Barring that, the substance or technology should never be
allowed out of the laboratory. The current push by our pandering
politicians to deregulate more industries has all the potential for
global catastrophe that resulted from deregulating our financial system.
That our government allows, even
promotes such items, and repeats uncritically the specious,
undocumented, untested, and all-too-often false claims of GMO producers,
speaks to one of two disquieting choices:
The regulatory agencies are
toothless nonentities, completely controlled by and subservient to the
corporations, who run the show in the interest of profit and
self-interest, not human benefit; or
The regulatory agencies are in league with corporations in a common genocidal agenda.
Either way, the regulatory agencies
should be disbanded, saving us all the multi-billion-dollar annual
budgets that are clearly being wasted to maintain the sham of protecting
public safety.
There is no third explanation for the
behavior of the FDA and USDA around GMO foods, for the FDA, CDC and NIH
promoting dangerous pharmaceuticals while attacking proven natural
remedies, and for the Nuclear Regulatory Agency promoting more dangerous
nuclear plants in the wake of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and
Fukushima.
Without accountability, corporations
will run roughshod over populations, corrupt politicians and regulators
will enrich themselves at our expense, and life on the planet will be
endangered. If we don't finally wake up to these facts, and very soon,
we are all in real trouble.
Could you be falling for the cholesterol scam and not even know it?
The idea of cholesterol creating cardiac problems has caused obsessive
cholesterol count blood testing for decades. Two other outcomes of the
cholesterol myth was individuals obsessively avoiding fat in our diets,
especially saturated fats – and ultimately turning to dangerous
cholesterol-reducing drugs known as statin drugs.
The food industry responded with low and no fat foods from milk to
cottage cheese and more. Processed foods promoted their low or no fat
contents as though they were the healthiest foods in the freezer.
Healthy fats such as coconut oil and palm oil were spurned and
replaced by very unhealthy trans-fat, processed and heated cooking oils.
Relatively healthy whole butters were replaced by plastic margarines.
However, this myth of cholesterol dangers lurking in saturated fats
waiting to clog your arteries and cause you to die of cardiac arrest is
beginning to unravel.
Unraveling the Cholesterol Scam
A meta-analysis of properly performed previous studies on heart
health and saturated fats concluded there was no association between
cardiac issues and saturated fats. This was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (AJCN) on January 13th, 2010. (1)
Meta-analysis is a statistical method of proving or disproving varied
epidemiological studies within a set topic. The AJCN meta-analysis
covered studies involving 350,000 subjects who were followed for 5 to 23
years.
The trend set by the saturated fat high cholesterol scam a few
decades ago has resulted in many Americans eating less fat and showing
lower blood cholesterol levels. Yet, heart disease rates have continued
to rise along with diabetes, pre-diabetes and obesity. (1)
Dr. William Davis explains in his article “A Headline You Will Never
See: 60 Year Old Man Dies of Cholesterol” that cholesterol doesn’t kill
“any more than a bad paint job on your car could cause a fatal car
accident.” (1)
He explains the cause of most heart attacks and coronary problems is
atherosclerotic plaque in the coronary arteries, which can build up and
rupture or clog the arteries. He goes on to describe other factors that
can cause plaque ruptures, including inflammatory pneumonia.
Though there can be some cholesterol in the plaque, cholesterol
itself is waxy and pliable. Cholesterol is important for brain cells,
nerves and other cellular structural components.
Calcium deposits (calcification) in artery interiors are the much
worse components of plaque; calcium belongs in your bones, not in your
arteries. Vitamin K2 helps transport calcium out of your blood and into
your bones.
Recent studies show
that taking calcium supplements is worse than just unnecessary. Those
who supplement with calcium are more likely to have cardiac issues as
they age with perhaps even weaker bones.
Dr. Davis recommends avoiding cholesterol panels for heart health
concerns and opting for a measure of coronary atherosclerotic plaque.
The Cholesterol Myth Continues Despite Overwhelming Contradictory Evidence
Despite more and more published journals and doctors proving coronary
heart disease (CHD) is not caused by high saturated fat diets and
cholesterol, the cholesterol myth persists. Many people with low
cholesterol have died of CHD while in their 40s, while many with high
cholesterol never have CHD issues.
Several studies of heart attack cadavers have also revealed the
disinformation of cholesterol dangers, yet the common advice from
cardiologists upon seeing high cholesterol is to get an angiogram,
a diagnostic test that is expensive and not so safe. (2) Then there are
those pricey statin drugs meant to lower cholesterol while wreaking
havoc on overall health. Shockingly, statins have actually been linked
to over 300 different adverse affects in peer-reviewed research, including cancer and liver damage.
The truth is, cholesterol is vital for many functions. For example,
it helps convert sunlight into vitamin D3. If you’re not getting enough
with your food, the liver is forced to manufacture it. Low cholesterol
has been linked to higher stroke risks as well.
Oxidized cholesterol from hydrogenated and refined polyunsaturated
cooking oils and margarine can lead to complications that result in CHD.
This comes not only directly from the oils themselves, but indirectly
from the oxidation process those oils initiate.
These toxic oils and butter substitutes were created to replace the wholesome saturated fats that should be consumed.
Vaginal birth triggers the expression of a protein in the brains of
newborns that improves brain development and function in adulthood,
according to a new study by Yale School of Medicine researchers, who
also found that this protein expression is impaired in the brains of
offspring delivered by caesarean section (C-sections).
These findings are published in the August issue of PLoS ONE by
a team of researchers led by Tamas Horvath, the Jean and David W.
Wallace Professor of Biomedical Research and chair of the Department of
Comparative Medicine at Yale School of Medicine.
The team studied the effect of natural and surgical deliveries on
mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) in mice. UCP2 is important for
the proper development of hippocampal neurons and circuits. This area
of the brain is responsible for short- and long-term memory. UCP2 is
involved in cellular metabolism of fat, which is a key component of
breast milk, suggesting that induction of UCP2 by natural birth may aid
the transition to breast feeding.
The researchers found that natural birth triggered
UCP2 expression in the neurons located in the hippocampal region of the
brain. This was diminished in the brains of mice born via C-section.
Knocking out the UCP2 gene or chemically inhibiting UCP2 function
interfered with the differentiation of hippocampal neurons and circuits,
and impaired adult behaviors related to hippocampal functions.
"These results reveal a potentially critical role of UCP2 in the proper
development of brain circuits and related behaviors," said Horvath. "The
increasing prevalence of C-sections driven by convenience rather than
medical necessity may have a previously unsuspected lasting effect on
brain development and function in humans as well."
Other authors on the study included Julia Simon-Areces, Marcelo O.
Dietrich, Gretchen Hermes, Luis Miguel Garcia-Segura, and Maria-Angeles
Arevalo.The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Journal Reference:
Julia Simon-Areces, Marcelo O. Dietrich, Gretchen Hermes, Luis Miguel
Garcia-Segura, Maria-Angeles Arevalo, Tamas L. Horvath. ''Ucp2 Induced
by Natural Birth Regulates Neuronal Differentiation of the Hippocampus
and Related Adult Behavior.'' PLoS ONE, 2012; 7 (8): e42911 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042911
The bumper sticker on the beat-up pickup truck read: “Friends don’t let friends vote Democrat.”
The driver was obviously not affluent. Yet, despite all the news
about mega-trillion dollar bankster bailouts, mega-million dollar
bonuses for financial crooks, and unimaginable compensation packages for
corporate CEOs who have moved middle class jobs out of America,
something made the down-and-out pickup truck driver associate with the
political party of the super-rich.
As I wondered at this strange alliance of the dirt poor with the
mega-rich, I remembered that in 2004 Thomas Frank wondered about how the
Republicans had managed to convince the poor to vote against their best
interests. Frank’s answer, or part of his answer, is that the
Republicans use “social issues,” such as gay marriage and Janet
Jackson’s exposed nipple to work up indignation over the threat to moral
values posed by liberal Democrats.
The working poor have been convinced by Republican propaganda that
voting Democrat means giving the working poor’s tax dollars to the
non-working poor, to providing medical care and schooling for illegal
aliens, and being soft on terrorism.
To the pick-up truck driver, standing up for America means standing
up for bankster bailouts and the military/security complex’s
multi-trillion dollar wars.
The Karl Rove Dirty Tricks Team has honed the Republican propaganda.
Republicans send each other via email an endless number of nonsense
stories about Obama being a Muslim, about Obama being a Marxist, about
Obama being a Manchurian Candidate turning America over to the New World
Order or the United Nations, or to some other dastardly plotting
organization. But never is Obama accused of turning the US over to Wall
Street, the military/security complex, or Israel.
There is never any citation or source for the accusations in the
emails. None are needed, because the words are what the Republicans
want to hear. Ask them why Obama would be killing Muslims in seven
countries if he was a Muslim, or why Wall Street and the
military/security complex would put a Marxist in the White House, and
they turn purple with rage. Just by asking the obvious questions instead
of joining in the denunciations, a person confirms the propaganda that
America is threatened by Obama dupes who won’t stand up for the country.
The non-affluent who rage about welfare, medicaid, Obamacare, and
public schools can’t seem to put two and two together. The $750 billion
TARP bankster bailout, a small part of the total and ongoing bailout,
would have sufficed to cover any holes in these budgets for a long
time.. Instead, the money went to reward those who caused the financial
crisis and threw millions of Americans out of their homes. As far as I
know, the pickup truck driver is one of the dispossessed.
The same brainwashed Americans who rage against Obamacare and are
lined up to vote for Romney are oblivious to the fact that Romney, while
governor of the eastern liberal Democratic state of Massachusetts, had
his version of Obamacare enacted at the state level.
The greatest irony about Obamacare is that it was written by the
private insurance companies and diverts Medicaid and Medicare funds to
their profits. It is socialized medicine alright, but it is socialism
for the private insurance companies.
All it took to convince Red staters to go along with the
military/security complex squandering $6 trillion on the Iraq and Afghan
wars was yellow ribbon decals and a slogan, “support the troops.”
Obama, Republicans claim, won’t stand up to Syria, or against Iran,
or for Israel. But Republicans are proud when Romney goes to Israel to
slither on his belly pandering to the crazed, blood-thirsty Israeli
prime minister Netanyahu, who called Israeli top generals “pussies” for
warning against attacking Iran. Romney told Netanyahu, just tell me what
to do, and I’ll do it; I am loyal to Israel. Apparently, flag-waving
Republican patriots are not bothered when their presidential candidate
announces that as soon as he is in office he will turn over US foreign
policy to Netanyahu and send more americans to death and bankruptcy for
Netanyahu.
Karl Rove didn’t have any trouble at all in brainwashing red staters
to support their own demise. The pickup truck driver could just as well
have sported a bumper sticker that read: “Don’t support a Democrat. He
might do something for you.”
Yes, I know. It is almost as easy to beat up on Democrats. Bush and
Cheney and their neocon hoodlums destroyed the Constitution and,
thereby, America. But the Democrats let them. It was Nancy Pelosi, who
as Speaker of the House stridently declared Bush’s impeachment to be
“off the table.”
Bush and Cheney unquestionably violated both US and international
laws and the Constitution. Nancy Pelosi’s refusal to hold them
accountable established the precedent that the executive branch is no
longer accountable to law or to the Constitution. In effect, the
executive branch now comprises a dictatorship. It acts outside of law
and constitutional restraints. On some issues it still has to consult
with Congress or the courts, but as the executive branch’s power and
audacity grows, consultation will become a formality and then drop away.
Congress will have no more influence than the Roman senate under the
empire, and courts will become stages for show trials.
Americans elected Obama president expecting that he would restore the
rule of law. Instead, he codified the Bush regime’s transgressions and
added some of his own. No one of my generation could have imagined the
president of the US sitting in the Oval Office signing off on lists of
American citizens to be murdered without evidence or due process of law.
So which do you want? The Republican panderer to the rich and Israel
whose foreign policy is war or the Democrat panderer to the rich and
Israel whose foreign policy is war? As Gerald Celente wrote in the July
issue of the Trends Journal, americans “argue among themselves why
their freak is better than the other freak. They will get angry with you
if you call their freak a freak. They will actually fight and die to
defend their freaks.”
It is extraordinary that millions of americans actually believe
fervently that it matters whether Romney freak or Obama freak gets
elected. If americans had any sense, they would stay home and not vote.
The 1% control the country, and the 99% had just as well own up to it
and stay at home. Nothing is going to change because of the ballot box.
What do you suppose the Ron Paul supporters will do? Will they see
Romney as the less socialist of the two and vote for the Republicans who
stole the nomination from Ron Paul? (Jaret Glenn, “How the GOP
Establishment Stole the Nomination from Ron Paul,” published on August 6
on the OpEdNews website. (http://www.opednews.com/populum/printer_friendly.php?content=a&id=154033)
The US is ruled by a private oligarchy. The government is merely
their front. The country’s resources are diverted to the pockets of Wall
Street, the military/security complex, and to the service of greater
Israel. The oil, mining, timber, and agribusiness companies control the
Environmental Protection Agency and the Forestry Service, which is why
regulation only pertains to the small individual, while fracking,
mountaintop removal mining, and pollution of air, water, and soil run
wild.
The oligarchs have succeeded in making americans a dispossessed
majority in their own country. In November americans will again give
their approval to one of the oligarchy’s two candidates.
Could we be human guinea pigs being fed food that hurts us and causes
new disease? Despite intense protests from consumer groups and
environmentalists, genetically modified organisms,
(GMOs) foods, have been dubbed as the 'human feeding experiment' and
are continuing to be integrated into the food supply. Most of us do not
even know the extent of it, as it is not in mainstream news.
In Kansas, for instance, an experimental 3200 acres of GMO rice have
been planted with inserted DNA from human organs. It is believed by the
cultivators that this becomes a catalyst for
'medications'-'pharmaceuticals'. Some rice is designed to stop
intestinal disease, to be used in the third world which will in theory
overcome chronic diarrhea. Besides the human health risks, there are
also unintended risks of contaminating normal rice fields. Rice is not
the only food experiment going on.
GMO's were approved in the US without undergoing long term tests to
determine if they were safe for human consumption. The rats that were
fed GMO food didn't do too well; they either died, or lived with
horrible distended intestines and misery. Yet, due to the lack of
required labeling, Americans do not know if they are consuming GMO foods
in a meal. Regardless of public outcry, the labeling of GMO's is not
required.
Engineered foods become GMO food. For example, some seeds are injected with human genes-DNA, and hence, they are not natural. It is not known what mutations might occur as a result. A subset of GMO foods are called Transgenic foods. Some researchers are suggesting that the rise in autism is due to Transgenic foods.
The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has advised
doctors to tell their patients to avoid GMOs. The introduction
of GMOs into the food chain has now been correlated with an alarming
rise in chronic diseases and food allergies. A growing body of evidence
has shown GMOs may cause mysterious allergies, immune reactions, liver
problems, sterility, and an alarming rise in severe chronic disease. New
diseases of unknown causes are sprouting up all over the world. Why?
Could it be GMO foods that have been 'sneaked' into our food, sauces,
and/or drinks?
To date, a list of 10 food products have been identified to be
genetically modified. They are as follows: Corn, Soy, Cotton, Papaya,
tomatoes, rice, rapeseed, peas, potatoes, and dairy products. Some of
these foods are called by different names. For example, rapeseed, an
industrial heating oil, was never meant for human consumption. It was
later called canola oil, and marketed as being a 'healthy' oil to consume. What are your french fries, fried in?
The debate continues regarding the safety of GMOs. People are eating
what is cleverly marketed, easy to obtain, and that which tastes good.
But, just look around. Obesity, increasing allergies, weird illness,
fatigue, rashes, gastrointestinal problems, and more dis-ease, are
plaguing people. What is inside the box that looks so promising when we
shop?
It is known that better health can be accomplished through conscious
awareness of what goes into the body. Avoiding GMO, buying organic
foods, growing your own food, might make the difference between feeling
'so so', and feeling good. Reduce your inflammation, by learning about today's foods, and increase your well being.
Anne
Gordon is an RN, an Author, Researcher, and a computer artist.
Fascinated with societies, and the future, she is drawn to medical
health trends of tomorrow. What will health look like? Will we be more
mechanical than spiritual? These are some of the concepts she is looking
at. Many of her articles like her art, are slightly outside the
mainstream box, aimed towards thought stimulation. She is also extremely
curious about how the ‘business’ of healthcare, and wellness intertwine
today.
Her artwork, is a combination of photography and painting, and is shown
in public. In her spare time, she teaches in a local community college.
Disclaimer:
This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or
treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of
GreenMedInfo or its staff.
Hepatitis-B is a viral attack on the liver that is transmitted
through sex, shared hypodermic needles, and iatrogenic (medical)
exposure. It’s a bodily fluid transmitted virus that often occurs among
those engaging in “risky behavior.” The Hep-B vaccination (HBV) is
administered at or near birth and again between three and six months of
age. It’s the beginning of a lengthy runway of hazardous pediatric
vaccinations recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Hep-B vaccination – A Danger to Infants
If vaccines worked safely, it would be prudent to screen expectant
women for hepatitis-B and exclude unnecessary Hep-B vaccinations for
newborns. Maybe a Hep-B vaccination would make any sort of sense for a newborn whose mother tested positive for hepatitis-B.
Except Hep-B Vaccinations Don’t Work and They are Very Dangerous
There are examples of acute hepatitis-B among those who had been
vaccinated. Those examples were from “high risk” adults, young and
promiscuous, and some who were exposed to hepatitis-B in clinics and
hospitals (iatrogenic exposure).
The announced removal of mercury adjuvants is a public relations distraction. Mercury based thimerosal has been replaced with aluminum hydroxide, which also creates serious adverse neurological effects.
Ironically, there is evidence of almost immediate liver damage from
HBV shots. Several animal studies with low dose Hep-B vaccines have been
published since the 1990s.
A recent study discovered gene mutations that led to liver cell
death. This study noted that vaccine manufacturers don’t test for gene
mutations in their safety tests. All the studies were reported in peer
reviewed journals.
How does all this affect helpless infants undergoing the CDC’s
rigorous vaccination schedule beginning at or near birth with the Hep-B
vaccination?
Renowned neurosurgeon and author Dr. Russell Blaylock puts it this
way: “Because the child’s brain is undergoing a period of rapid growth
from the third trimester of pregnancy until age 2 years, his or her
brain is at considerable risk from this insane policy” [infant
vaccinations].
The statistical evidence of rapidly rising autism and SIDS (sudden
infant death syndrome) is overwhelming. Yet only five percent of adverse
events (at best) get reported to the adverse event reporting system (AERS), making it easier for the CDC to claim their low risk to benefit vaccine ratios.
Even with those cooked books, adverse effects and deaths from HBV
vaccines greatly outnumber the hepatitis-B infections and deaths among
children between 10 and 14 years of age, considered the earliest age
span for hepatitis-B from “high risk behavior.”
One would get a realistic adverse event statistic by multiplying what
is reported by almost ten. Most affected adversely don’t know about
AERS. Others don’t want to bother with the level of effort required,
while many doctors prefer to deny giving a shot that destroyed a child’s
life.
The CDC has steadily increased the vaccination schedule since the
late 1970s, inserting the Hep-B vaccination shot in the 1990s. Autism
has skyrocketed by almost 90 percent in three decades. Sudden infant
death syndrome (SIDS) has also jumped dramatically within the USA, which
is leading industrialized nations in that category.
Nevertheless, mainstream medicine constantly promotes vaccine safety
and efficacy for HBV shots and all others. They continually dismiss
those statistics as not scientific evidence for causality; while freely
using epidemiology statistics, often manipulated, for their purposes.
Don’t fall for their spin. Spare your child’s future, and yours, the
agony of constant suffering and medical care from adverse vaccine injury
damage. If a pregnant woman doesn’t have hepatitis-B, the Hep-B
vaccination shouldn’t even be considered.
Vaccinations are risky at any age. Before two years, when HBV vaccinations are scheduled, negative health results are highly probable later if not sooner.
Comment: I've added Gizmo to the analecta as this is what the medical mafia think of your liver according to precise etymological record. Fooling
with both RNA and DNA, the mafia now have additional methods of measuring inside the body which assists them in creating new disease which are most profitable.
The liver once thought to be a miracle organ that produced blood has baffled scienitist and the sacred organs connection to love was unacceptable, so it
was given a new name, Gizmo, which is defined as a mechanical device or part whose name is forgotten or unknown.
(NaturalNews) Not content simply drugging its millions of victims with
mind-altering chemical and biological inputs, the pharmaceutical
industry is now developing ways to literally transform the human brain
into a drug industry-controlled, biometric computer that will basically
turn human beings into nothing more than mind-controlled robots.
The Financial Times
reports that GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the drug behemoth recently forced
to fork over the largest ever amount in fines for its massive criminal
conduct (http://www.naturalnews.com),
is leading the way in unveiling what the industry is now calling
"bioelectronics." The premise holds that certain diseases can be treated
by injecting electronic devices within the body for the purpose of
artificially controlling neuronal synapses and other activity.
"Moving
beyond conventional drugs that interact biochemically with the body,
[Big Pharma] will have built a big 'bioelectronics' business that treats
disease through electrical signaling in the brain and elsewhere,"
writes Clive Cookson for FT.com about the concept, which is expected to eventually replace many common drugs.
"Neurological
problems, from stroke and epilepsy to depression, will be treated
through electronic implants into the brain rather than pills or
injections. Even diabetes and obesity will be attacked in ways that seem
like science fiction today, by sending electrical signals to
malfunctioning cells."
Rather than help the body naturally heal
itself through proper nutrition, cleansing, and lifestyle,
bioelectronics basically bypasses the body's own immune and healing
systems, and replaces them with remote-controlled computer chips that
can be programmed and monitored by outside forces. It is the embodiment
of the "bionic man" or "cyborg" concept, where human beings are taken
over by computers and mind-controlled.
Drug companies admit in plain sight their plans for mass mind control
Presented
alongside glowing results from a few recent clinical trials showing how
the technology can be used to potentially help tetraplegics and other
seriously injured or paralyzed patients regain function, bioelectronics
has the very real potential to be used for much more sinister purposes
like controlling thought patterns -- yes, researchers are already saying
it can be used to treat "depression" -- as well as individual eating
habits and preferences.
Though the idea is still potentially
years or even decades away from actually being commercialized, the stage
is being set for its eventual widespread use. Experimental treatments,
such as the battery-powered electrodes that were implanted into Edi
Guyton's brain tissue to cure her depression (http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/14/health/battery-powered-brain/index.html), are already being actualized in the name of modern medicine.
"Ultimately,
[bioelectronics] treats people in a purely mechanical way, where
subjective personal inputs that may not always be helpful are bypassed,"
wrote one commenter in response to the FT.com piece. "How long
before someone suggests serial criminals are fitted with bioelectrical
patches that stymie endorphins and reduce the excitement associated with
criminal behavior? Or perhaps release a toxin that makes the person ill
if they feel stimulated in the 'wrong way?'"
Comment: It seems expected that the antiproliferation theory dept. otherwise known as chemotherapy would extend their reach of which there is no
difference in this proliferation for profits. They are one and the same.
Although many studies have been conducted about the association between a
vegetarian diet and physical health, very little work has been done on
the associations between a vegetarian diet and mental health.
And as more people are persuaded that a vegetarian diet is a healthy
diet, it is essential that they are made aware of the possible adverse
effects of such a diet.
In 2008, a study was published which showed that adopting a vegetarian
lifestyle could lead to a significant amount of brain shrinkage, and
that the more extreme the diet (vegan) caused the most extreme brain
loss.[1] I reported this at Vegetarians have smaller brains
Now, a 2012 study links vegetarianism with other mental conditions.[2] The mental conditions studied include:
Unipolar Depressive Disorders
Anxiety Disorders
Somatoform Disorders and Syndromes
Eating Disorders
This latest study adds to previous evidence that concerns about the
healthiness of vegetarianism are well-founded and need to be taken very
seriously.
The premise behind vaccines is that it will help children fight viral
infections as they age. But a U-M study suggests the natural ability
to fight infection is there early on. Vaccines can inhibit the growth
of essential immune cells early in life, and avoiding vaccines could
actually improve an infant’s response to infection. More specifically,
vaccines are suppressing a very specific type of protein which inhibits
the growth of specific cancers.
“What happens at early age is that natural killer cells, like many
other immune cells, do not complete their functional maturation until
adulthood,” says study senior author Yasmina Laouar, Ph.D., assistant
professor in the U-M Department of Microbiology and Immunology.
”During this time we are left with an immature
immune system that cannot protect us against infections, the reason
why newborns and infants are more prone to infection,” she says.
Vaccines promote and extend the immature immune
system of infants preventing the natural formation of immune cells. This
is not only accomplished by interfering with DNA but introducing heavy metals such as aluminum, mercury and other toxic preservatives found in vaccines.
There is a large gap in understanding infant
immunity, specifically why the natural killer cell responses are
deficient. The study by immunologists at the U-M demonstrates the role
of a cell called transforming growth factor beta that can explain why
most vaccine scientists mistakenly believe that suppression of the
body's natural signaling mechanisms benefits immunity when it actively
suppresses it.
The study showed the production of natural
killer cells is controlled by TGF-beta, which is produced in the bone
marrow. In infant mice, the maturation of natural killer cells
progressed faster in the absence of TGF-beta signaling. Many vaccines
are also designed to actively suppress TGF-beta signaling which results
in a physiological consequence to the human body. It actually reverses
the intended purpose, namely to immunize. Attempting to suppress natural
killer cells artificially by blocking TGF-beta signaling, actually
causes tumors to grow.
What many of these scientists fail to recognize is
that that effects of TGF-beta on tumor cells and the tumor
micro-environment exert both positive and negative influences on
cancer development. By focusing on TGF-beta signaling to produce more
natural killers cells, the consequence and risk of disease monitoring
cells being impaired is very high. Thus, the risk exceeds any
preliminary benefits claimed by producing more mature natural killer
cells.
Authors say it’s tempting to propose the
functional inactivation TGF-beta signaling as a strategy to reverse
the deficit of natural killer cells early in life. However the
long-term effects of such an initiative will be devasting.
Many scientists are fully aware of the dual nature
of TGF-beta signaling, i.e. tumor suppressor vs. tumor promoter, so it's
not clear why so much research is devoted to creating vaccines to
suppress TGF-beta when a high probability of cancer growth and
pro-metastatic factor are inevitable outcomes.
If we allow an infant's immune system to naturally
develop with optimal nourishment, breast milk, and vitamin D, there is
little more that any infant will need to optimize health. If we
continue to pursue artificial means of immunization, it will only lead
to the polar opposite result, immune suppression and inevitably cancer.
Vaccination is not immunization and it never will be.
Dave Mihalovic
is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine
research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to
treatment.
Comment: I've added factotums to the analecta for the transforming growth factor beta ideas which claim to have an antiproliferation factor as
though the electromagnetic spectrum were the food of thought. Wikipedia also mentions statins on the same page in a very strange way by mentioning an unquoted animal study in relation to heart disease as an attempt it seems to downplay cholesterol and the influence this may play in overall health.
If these factotums are actually secreted then it would seem they are coming as a form of intelligence from some place we haven't seen yet.
Resuming its upward trend after dropping in the Spring, Los Angeles air
radiation has doubled in a recent 52-day period ending August 1, 2012.
This reading was taken from the dust aggregate of three HEPA air filter
machines that showed radiation emanation reading 205% of normal. The
previous 96-day period registered 192% of normal. This equates in the
present period, on a per day basis, to represent roughly a doubling of
the last period's alpha and beta dust. Spot checks of the HEPA filters
before vacuuming to create the aggregate dust pile showed a hot spot on
one HEPA filter topping out at ~284% of normal eventually settling down
to ~239% of normal. These readings were taken at Radiation Station Santa
Monica where there is no "radon progeny" to influence the readings
meaning that these numbers are accurate. The possible reason for this
doubling of the radiation could be explained by a surge in beta and
gamma radiation detected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Rad Net station at an undisclosed location in Los Angeles during early
July. That graph will appear on an upcoming EnviroReporter.com post
called "L.A Air Radiation Doubles."
US Used Micro Nukes in Afghanistan and Iraq Wars: Gordon Duff
An interview with Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of Veterans Today
…the US has produced approximately 600 micro nukes, some of
them smaller than a soccer ball, with the capability as low as a single
ton of TNT dialable up to 40 tons of TNT. There is evidence that those
weapons have been used in Iraq and Afghanistan. Studies have found
uranium 235 to be in the bodies of the population there.”
The United States’ use of powerful genetic weapons such as
depleted uranium on the battle field is in violation of every
conceivable international law, says an analyst.
Depleted uranium has a half-life of 4.5 billion years and has thus
earned the title “The silent killer that will never stop killing”.
Shells, bombs and cruise missiles tipped with depleted uranium and
tungsten easily pierce through heavy armor and fortifications. Air,
water and soil are also contaminated when such weapons are used.
Dr. Doug Rokke, the ex-director of the Pentagon’s Depleted Uranium
Project, says there is no way to totally decontaminate an area hit with
uranium. (Editor: Comprehensive video from 2002, demonstrating our
decade plus DU cover up. Please forward and watch as much as possible.)
Serious long-term health problems caused by the use of depleted
uranium in bombs can range from cancer to leukemia and genetic
mutations.
The United Nations has prohibited the manufacture, testing, use, sale and stockpiling of depleted uranium weapons.
The US dropped thousands of depleted uranium bombs on the Iraq city of Fallujah in 2003, which killed thousands of people.
A great proportion of all births in Fallujah since the strike have
suffered from abnormalities and the rate of mutation among newborns is
higher than what was found in Japan after America attacked the Asian
country during the Second World War.
Press TV has conducted an interview with senior editor of Veterans
Today (VT) website, Gordon Duff, to further discuss the issue.
The video also offers the opinions of two other guests: political
analyst and writer Linh Dinh, and peace activist Max Obuszewksi.
The following is a rough transcription of the interview.
Press TV: Gordon Duff, when we are speaking about the reasons why not
a single country has gotten rid of its nuclear weapons, some people are
saying this is about nuclear superiority, a kind of deterrence as our
guest Linh Dinh there was saying as well, the issue of guaranteeing the
security of a nation when it comes to how officials describe it.
Basically what do you think are the reasons and could you say that there
is any strategic value in keeping nuclear weapons?
Duff: Well there are a couple of different levels to
look at this. We left two nations out, Pakistan and India, and they are
of the highest risk of nuclear war than any two nations on earth.Most
people don’t know that since 1982 Brazil has held between ten and twenty
nuclear weapons that they have developed.
Japan has an interim nuclear capability in that they are sitting on
tons of enriched uranium at a facility in a…prefecture…and bombs that
are ready to assemble but not assembled.
They have decided though that they have the capability not to
exercise that capability, which is in interim standing, that some have
suggested would be a position that they could live with involving Iran.
The issue that is brought up by a previous speaker, however, is that
we have thoroughly seen in the last year that nuclear power itself can
be as harmful as nuclear weapons.
That although nuclear weapons supposedly have secured peace through
mutual assured destruction, every nuclear facility in the world leaks
radiation and the nuclear industry is so powerful it suppresses bad
news. Press TV: Gordon Duff, a lot of people have been
saying the United States has been spending so much, hundreds of billions
of dollars to maintain its nuclear arsenal, to repair them, to produce
new nuclear weapons, we’re asking is it worth it?
We’re hearing some generals in the air force, elsewhere, even in the
nuclear industry, saying that the cost of maintaining these stockpiles
that are not even used, are not even on the alert status, is just too
expensive now for the United States?
Duff: Well, there is an additional issue that people
that don’t work in the defense industry aren’t unaware of, but the US
has produced approximately 600 micro nukes, some of them smaller than a
soccer ball, with the capability as low as a single ton of TNT dialable
up to 40 tons of TNT.
There is evidence that those weapons have been used in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Studies have found uranium 235 to be in the bodies of the
population there.
Plus, of course, you have to count depleted uranium munitions as a
form of nuclear weapons. We have used thousands of tons of these
munitions which have long-term health effects on the entire planet, have
raised the radiation levels of the entire Middle East and spreading
much further than that.
This problem runs much further than guessed. Our nuclear technology
has allowed tactical nuclear weapons to become not only so commonly used
but they are now being used in place of conventional weapons because
new tactical nukes leave no residual radiation that can be detected by
conventional Geiger counters.
I have that information from individuals who
worked in our research labs. We have used those weapons on countries in
the last few years.
Press TV: Gordon Duff in Ohio, would you say that
we are not going to see any serious move towards nuclear disarmament in
spite of the hopes that people express in Japan on this 67th anniversary
of the Hiroshima, Nagasaki bombings?
Duff: Well, I think one of the things — and this is
an issue I would put to the Japanese people — if they would correct
their own history books which are as edited and inaccurate as those of
Israel or the United States. Japan exploded its first nuclear weapon
August 5th, 1945.
The uranium that was used on Hiroshima was from Sweden. It was being
shipped to Japan and it was intercepted by the US. It was planned by the
Japanese to be used at a nuclear attack on San Francisco. Japan had a
very advanced nuclear weapons program at World War II, far more advanced
than Germany.
(Press TV Interview, August 7,2012 on US Military Hospitals in Afghanistan)
They have erased that from their own history. So they’re learning
lessons but they’re learning lessons where they’re not taking
responsibility for their own full complicity in what has gone on.
They were as involved in nuclear weapons as the United States was and
they only missed by days of being the first one to use nuclear weapons.
Japan’s policy was to attack the US. Now they just erased that from their own history.
The issue was brought up earlier about depleted uranium and genocide
is a critical issue because depleted uranium isn’t just from the Apache
helicopter.
We have 50 different munitions using depleted uranium and it is a
powerful genetic weapon. It is being sold needlessly as a profiteering
move as waste products by the nuclear power industry and their powerful
lobby within the United States.
These weapons have no place on the battle field and they’re a violation of every imaginable international law.
At the end of the eighteenth century, British physician Edward Jenner,
with highly questionable medical credentials, initiated the theory and
practice of live virus immunization that continues to serve as the
scientific basis for the ever increasing vaccination of the world's
citizens. With the number of vaccinations given to infants and children
rising, kids are receiving doses of toxic mercury and other heavy metals
well above environmental safety levels.
Yet the medical evidence
is clear. Mercury, known as thimerosal, and other heavy metal additives
are highly toxic and threaten children with neurological damage. The
long-term efficacy of global vaccination remains controversial,
inconclusive and is suspect in light of the powerful corporate
interests, lobbying efforts, and profits associated with a multi-billion
dollar vaccine industry..
In his documentary film Vaccine
Nation, award-winning investigative film director Dr. Gary Null
challenges the basic health claims by government health agencies and
pharmaceutical firms that vaccines are perfectly safe. This is one of
the most critical questions facing today's children and future
generations to come. If inoculation with a large regimen of vaccines is
safe, what can account for the rapid increase in autism and other mental
disabilities that are now at epidemic proportions? And why isn't the
sudden onset of neurological illnesses in children being treated as an
urgent crisis by our government and medical industries?
Weaving
together interviews with many of the nations most expert medical
researchers, private physicians specializing in autism, parents of
children victimized by immunization, congressmen, vaccination activists,
legal authorities and more, Vaccine Nation will awaken viewers to one
of the continual perils to the health and future of children.
It’s a known fact that eugenics driven oligarchs have long been
poisoning the general populace through various depopulation programs.
From GMO foods, to famine, drought, starvation, and financial control
the puppet masters who control us can cause a whirlwind of havok
wherever, whenever, on whatever they desire.
No, this is not some urban legend as weather modification programs,
geoengineering, and chemtrailing operations are well documented.
Depopulation of the third world has also been documented and even
touched on in Henry Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum 200
(NSSM 200), and other white papers.
But what about blatant depopulation in America through vaccines?
BeWellBuzz.com reports 10 reasons why flu vaccines are not safe (here are 5);
The verdict is out on flu shots. Many medical
experts now agree it is more important to protect yourself and your
family from the flu vaccine than the flu itself. Let’s take a look at
the reasons behind this verdict:
1.) There is a total lack of real evidence that
young children even benefit from flu shots. A systematic review of 51
studies involving 260,000 children age 6 to 23 months foundno evidence that the flu vaccine is any moreeffective than
a placebo. Also the shots are only able to protect against certain
strains of the virus, which means that if you come into contact with a
different strain of virus you will still get the flu.
2.) Medical journals have published thousands of articles revealing that injecting vaccines can actually lead to serious health problems including
harmful immunological responses and a host of other infections. This
further increases the body’s susceptibility to the diseases that the
vaccine was supposed to protect against.
3.) Ever noticed how vaccinated children within days or few weeks develop runny noses, pneumonia, ear infections and bronchiolitis?
The reason is the flu virus introduced in their bodies which creates
these symptoms. It also indicates immuno-suppression i.e. lowering of the immunity.The flu vaccines actually do not immunize but sensitize the body against the virus.
4.) Its a known fact that Flu vaccines contain
strains of the flu virus along with other ingredients. Now think about
the impact such a vaccine can have over someone with a suppressed immune
system? If you have a disease that is already lowering your body’s
ability to fight a virus, taking the flu shot will put your body in
danger of getting the full effects of the flu and make you more susceptible to pneumonia and other contagious diseases.
5.) The Flu vaccines contain mercury, a heavy metal
known to be hazardous for human health. The amount of mercury contained
in a multi-dose flu shot is much higher than the maximum allowable daily
exposure limit. Mercury toxicity can cause memory loss,depression, ADD, oral health problems, digestive imbalances, respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases and many more such serious health ailments.
However, what is most terrifying is the fact that Kmart is offering free flu shots to the general public;
A Chronicle.Augusta article reads;
Kmart is offering a coupon for a free flu shot to anyone
who makes a single purchase of $100 through Sunday, Aug. 12, according
to Shannelle Armstrong-Fowler, director of public relations at Sears
Holdings Corp.
The offer is exclusive to members of Kmart’s free Shop Your Way
Rewards program. The coupon is redeemable between Sept. 23 and Oct. 20,
while supplies last. Appointments must be made by Sept. 8.
The coupon is valid in-store only and prints at the register. Limit one coupon per transaction.
How nice of them. They are so loving.
Comment: This is certainly creepy news. I haven't been inside a Kmart in decades as these stores offer nothing of value. It's interesting the
association to the anti-quack concept with the film being released which uses the yang symbology as a way to describe it. We are told in philosophy that
this is the sun and that Yin is shade. In science however, darkness can only be recognized by light, darkness is not-recognition. So in effect, not-recognition
is being described which fits nicely into the anti-quack concept as that is used by the meso. Here we see two versions of macro use, one is to label others of not-recognition (anti-Semite, etc.), and as described, the dynamics of the illusion. I hope this film does well, and I also hope that people see it for what it truly
represents which may help in the long run.
New Research: Statins Increase Risk of Polymalgia Rheumatica 14-Fold
Few drugs are as toxic to the organ they are prescribed to "treat" as
statins. There are already hundreds of studies indicating that statin
drugs are muscle-damaging (myotoxic) and nerve-damaging (neurotoxic),
and yet they are somehow still legally allowed to be sold to millions of
patients worldwide, ostensibly to protect the human heart -- which is,
mind you, a muscle with an exceptionally high density of nerves.
After research published back in 2009 in the journal Cardiology found that statin drug use was associated with impaired heart muscle function,
there is little doubt remaining that they do far more harm than good.
In fact, no less than 300 adverse health effects have been linked to
this chemical class of drugs.
Some of the most consistently observed effects listed below
Liver Damage
Rhabdomyolysis
Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency
Type 2 Diabetes
Cataract
Pancreatitits
Cognitive Decline/Dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction
Peripheral Neuropathies
Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Recently published research reveals another way in which the obvious
damage caused by statin drugs is being covered up, whether by ignorance
or intention. Statin drug-induced symptoms have been renamed in Greek as
a newly minted, seemingly unrelated disease: Polymyalgia Rheumatica.
Polymyalgia translates from the Greek "pain in many muscles," and rheumatic means "flux." Published in the journal PLoS,
researchers analyzed the World Health Organization's Global Individual
Case Safety Database, and found that of the 327 cases of PMR reported, "
statins were more frequently reported as suspected agent (29.4%)
compared to non-cases (2.9%)."
They found a 14-fold increased relative risk for PMR in statin users:
After adjustment for several covariates, statins were significantly associated with reports of PMR (ROR 14.21; 95% CI 9.89-20.85).
Research like this reveals a likely possibility, namely, that the
well-known muscle soreness (myalgia) and inflammation (myositis)
associated with statin drugs is far from a rare "side effect" and is
likely universally present, the difference being only the degree to
which the damage and subsequent adverse effects are experienced. So,
instead of calling statin-induced muscle damage by its proper name, the
medical establishment projects a "new syndrome," dressed up in Greek,
onto the symptom picture.
Furthermore, given the wide range of natural substances with cholesterol-lowering properties which are available either as foods, e.g. chocolate and coconut water, or benign plant extracts, e.g. policosanol,
with far superior safety and at least equivalent efficacy versus a
drug, continuing forward with the statin drug paradigm is not only
illogical but highly immoral.
Comment: I've added the anti-quack which is similar to anti-quarks which come from the meson, and the mesoisms of life. The fact that statins still
exist proves this construct is both a part of understanding our minds, and the validation of the soviet republic in charge.
A team of researchers looking into why cancer cells are so resilient
accidentally stumbled upon a far more important discovery. While
conducting their research, the team discovered that chemotherapy
actually heavily damages healthy cells and subsequently triggers them to
release a protein that sustains and fuels tumor growth. Beyond that, it even makes the tumor highly resistant to future treatment.
Reporting their findings in the journal Nature Medicine,
the scientists report that the findings were ‘completely unexpected’.
Finding evidence of significant DNA damage when examining the effects of
chemotherapy on tissue derived from men with prostate cancer, the
writings are a big slap in the face to mainstream medical organizations
who have been pushing chemotherapy as the only option to cancer patients
for years.
The news comes after it was previously ousted by similarly-breaking research
that expensive cancer drugs not only fail to treat tumors, but actually
make them far worse. The cancer drugs were found to make tumors
‘metasize’ and grow massively in size after consumption. As a result,
the drugs killed the patients more quickly.
Known as WNT16B, scientists who performed the research say that this
protein created from chemo treatment boosts cancer cell survival and is
the reason that chemotherapy actually ends lives more quickly. Co-author
Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle explains:
“WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumour
cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist
subsequent therapy.”
The team then complimented the statement with a word of their own:
“Our results indicate that damage responses in benign cells… may directly contribute to enhanced tumour growth kinetics.”
Meanwhile, dirt cheap substances like turmeric and ginger have
consistently been found to effectively shrink tumors and combat the
spread of cancer. In a review of 11 studies, it was found that turmeric
use reduced brain tumor size by a shocking 81%. Further research has
also shown that turmeric is capable of halting cancer cell growth
altogether. One woman recently hit the mainstream headlines by revealing her victory against cancer with the principal spice used being turmeric.
This accidental finding reached by scientists further shows the lack
of real science behind many ‘old paradigm’ treatments, despite what many
health officials would like you to believe. The truth of the matter is
that natural alternatives do not even receive nearly as much funding as
pharmaceutical drugs and medical interventions because there’s simply no
room for profit. If everyone was using turmeric and vitamin D for
cancer (better yet cancer prevention), major drug companies would lose
out.
Comment: Again, delusion rules. When one enters what is perceived as a hospital, one has already been had. The patient is the host and the
stranger. There is no hospital, there is only a building with doctors and nurses who make money, and investors who run a business. This pseudomorph, also
a xenomorph is for the mind to let the ghost rule the affair.
